I think you misunderstood Blitzkrieg80, he has reconstructed the language we will be using for the Sweboz.
Foot
I think you misunderstood Blitzkrieg80, he has reconstructed the language we will be using for the Sweboz.
Foot
EBII Mod Leader
Hayasdan Faction Co-ordinator
Will we still be implementing an Armenian voice mod, or will that just be carried over to EB2?
The Armenian voicemod will appear in EBI, but it will be made during the EBII development period.
Foot
EBII Mod Leader
Hayasdan Faction Co-ordinator
Wow, a separate Armenian voice mod? EB must have a lot of resources, which is good of course, to make an entire voicemod for just one faction, especially so small and relatively insignificant (please don't flame me, after all, the Armenians weren't as pivotal as Seleukids, Romans, Parthians, Greeks, etc) . I know that EB doesn't work on a certain faction just because it was important and that EB attempts to accurately recreate all factions equally, but there is still a reason why the Celtic, Latin, and Greek voicemods were on of the first ones made. I'm guessing that is because the Ancient Armenian was very similar to the modern version, right?
So what voicemods is the EB team planning to do in the near/far future or is already doing? Seems that the Germanic and Pahlava, as well as the Armenian ones are going to come out, but are there any other?
Last edited by Aemilius Paulus; 10-22-2008 at 04:09.
@Aemilius Paulus: you seem to have a distorted view of what type of Voicemod we are talking about. The type in this case applies to specific units, and not as much to specific factions. It is similar to how Celtic units of the Arche Seleukeia will still use the Celtic Voicemod, regardless of the fact that the Arche uses the Greek one. Hence, Armenian units in the employ of whatever faction should end up speaking Armenian.
- Tellos Athenaios
CUF tool - XIDX - PACK tool - SD tool - EVT tool - EB Install Guide - How to track down loading CTD's - EB 1.1 Maps thread
“ὁ δ᾽ ἠλίθιος ὣσπερ πρόβατον βῆ βῆ λέγων βαδίζει” – Kratinos in Dionysalexandros.
You're right, it was. It was a pivotal nation. Armenia was the morsel of land that the Romans and later Byzantines always fought over with other nations as well as with Armenia itself. However, I was saying that the Seleukids, Romans, Parthians, and Greeks were more, most likely much more pivotal. Armenia made a difference, but certainly not as big. It is, after all, far easier to imagine history without Armenia than without Greeks, Romans, Seleukids, or Makedonia for instance. Not accepting the fact that some nations were simply more important than others is an ever present problem with people, as I have observed.
To Tellos Athenaios: Yeah, I realized that recently as well. However, I have heard that some of parts of the voicemod apply to cultures as a whole, such as when you select a couple of units instead of one, n'est-ce pas?
First of all your comment that I have made in bold is offensive. I will however tell you this in the Long and I mean very long history of Armenia many nations that you might view as "more important" have tryed to do just that. However they have all failed miserably, and many of those "important" nations do not even exist today. While Armenia has kept its traditions and culture alive for over three thousand years. Now my friend I think that in itself makes Armenia a very important nation.
You need to do more research MUCH MUCH more research. FIrst of all what is it that the Seleukids did that outweighs over 3000 years of Armenian history?? Where are the Seleukids?? Erebuni which is modern Yerevan was built in 782BC 29 years before the name Rome even existed. Armenian art and arcitecture have added much wealth to Human civilization. European gothic churches were inspired by Armenian Church architecture. Armenia was one of the centers of the Neolithic agricultural revolution not to mention irrigation, and metalurgy
Last edited by artavazd; 10-23-2008 at 03:12.
Yes. Which is what happens if an Armenian unit leads the battle, so in other words: that should only happen with armies composed of primarily Armenian units. Either a local army then (for which it makes good sense to use Armenian) or an army of an Armenian polity. In either case, that's a cool immersive feature isn't it?
Also, I forgot to tell you; the number of Voicemods isn't neccesarily an indication of the (wo)man-power EB got: quite a few are joint efforts, opportunities to work with people outside EB and/or it may involve team members who'se efforts are wasted elsewhere. I mean, I can 'do' Ancient Greek a bit but I'm worthless by any form of decent standards when it comes to historical research. So, I'll hope to find time to do more on the Ancient Greek Voicemod, but the fact that I do does not indicate EB is -in theory- ready to release the Hellenistic factions.
@Foot: yeah, I see what you mean however there is a difference between 'EB 1' and 'EB 2': in EB 1 as we both know it would be impossible due to similar restrictions as those that apply to the Voicemod for the Sweboz in EB 1. In EB 2 with its system of accents, thats a whole different matter and if we have the opportunity .... it's going to be so awesome.![]()
- Tellos Athenaios
CUF tool - XIDX - PACK tool - SD tool - EVT tool - EB Install Guide - How to track down loading CTD's - EB 1.1 Maps thread
“ὁ δ᾽ ἠλίθιος ὣσπερ πρόβατον βῆ βῆ λέγων βαδίζει” – Kratinos in Dionysalexandros.
Those bold underlined bits, that was 'The Point (tm)'. Or perhaps the controversy which ensued. However, bear with me just a little longer: I have not seen anyone saying "Romans are descendant of Armenians" or anthing so much as implying this. All we have seen is the (widely accepted) thesis that Latin is a derivative of a speculative Indo-European language of which its first natively speaker most likely hailed from what is known as Armenia. The Hittites are only one such people, but seems on a relative solid basis that they are the result of a migration from Armenia.
This says little about the Romans except their language is derived from an Armenian language; if someone therefore argues that the Romans were so influential by virtue of the widespread loan words from and existance of derivative languages today, he must a fortiori conclude that Armenians of long, long ago have been (especially in this regard) equally influential if not more (because this Indo-European language also similarly influenced Iranian and Germanic languages among others such as Sanskrit).
Ergo that argument merely serves to show the logical fallacy of the assumption that because of Latin's influence the importance of Romans can be shown. It cannot. For all that it matters, I think the Latin influences in our language are more a product of Medieval Latin, which was not even Roman Latin to begin with: Erasmus complained for some reason.
The only other argument I heard was that the Romans conquered such an vast amount of area. And spread its culture. Truth is likely closer to the idea that this culture spreading worked both ways, and at any rate much of the 'Imperial' (or indeed all) Roman culture was borrowed from other cultures to begin with. You may want to compare the effect of (ancient and continuous) policies of Chinese authorities to style the cultures of their realm towards Han precedent. Yet: it is Qin script and Chu food the Chinese are famous for.
Conquering a vast amount of area is a similar argument to that of the language thing. It is true the Romans conquered a vast amount of people, but it is dwarfed in the face of what some Chinese dynasties have conquered. Or compare the territory the Khans subjugated.
Last edited by Tellos Athenaios; 10-26-2008 at 22:39.
- Tellos Athenaios
CUF tool - XIDX - PACK tool - SD tool - EVT tool - EB Install Guide - How to track down loading CTD's - EB 1.1 Maps thread
“ὁ δ᾽ ἠλίθιος ὣσπερ πρόβατον βῆ βῆ λέγων βαδίζει” – Kratinos in Dionysalexandros.
Bookmarks