Results 1 to 30 of 71

Thread: US use of "soldiers of fortune"

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: US use of "soldiers of fortune"

    I wonder how good the photos are that they can make with those Polaroid sunglasses...
    Eh I mean the opening post does indeed seem a bit biased to me and a link instead of some book recommendation would be very nice, otherwise, as has been said, this can be spun to anyone's agenda.
    In my opinion being a mercenary does not make someone evil by itself, some of them are paid to protect certain buildings inside Baghdad, if we ignore the bigger guns, what makes them so different from a security guard in a bank or a policeman guarding a protest? Yeah, there are probably evil mercenaries out there but then there are also evil kings so doesn't it bother you that sweden has a king?


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  2. #2
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: US use of "soldiers of fortune"

    If the mercenaries are as or more cost effective than regular troops, I see no reason why they should not be used on the battlefield to supplement forces, or to be used to free American soldiers for use elsewhere.

  3. #3
    Member Member Koga No Goshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA.
    Posts
    2,596

    Default Re: US use of "soldiers of fortune"

    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars View Post
    If the mercenaries are as or more cost effective than regular troops, I see no reason why they should not be used on the battlefield to supplement forces, or to be used to free American soldiers for use elsewhere.
    They're only more cost effective because Blackwater lets the U.S. military do the initial training at taxpayer expense, and then pocket/brain-drains vets into private Blackwater service.

    While we have a recruitment shortage and argue over troop benefits...

    and wonder why there are morale problems..
    Koga no Goshi

    I give my Nihon Maru to TosaInu in tribute.

  4. #4
    Backordered Member CrossLOPER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Brass heart.
    Posts
    2,414

    Default Re: US use of "soldiers of fortune"

    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars View Post
    If the mercenaries are as or more cost effective than regular troops, I see no reason why they should not be used on the battlefield to supplement forces, or to be used to free American soldiers for use elsewhere.
    That's not the argument.
    Requesting suggestions for new sig.

    -><- GOGOGO GOGOGO WINLAND WINLAND ALL HAIL TECHNOVIKING!SCHUMACHER!
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    WHY AM I NOT BEING PAID FOR THIS???

  5. #5
    Banned Kadagar_AV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    In average 2000m above sea level.
    Posts
    4,176

    Default Re: US use of "soldiers of fortune"

    KukriKhan, troops can murder just like anyone else.

    In this particular case you are correct though, "slaughtered" would probably be a better word, as I am sure not all deaths were pure murders, very few in comparison to be exact.

    But as I former trooper, I mus say that I on the contrary know there is a thin line between sanctioned kill and outright murder. If you feel threatened, you tend to shoot first and think later, meaning a lot of unneeded happens in each and every war. Specially if teh combatants dont share a language.


    PanzerJaeger, very constructive.


    papewaio, Indeed. As I said, murders are quite common in wars.



    Husar, wrong word there... tehee...

    I gave you a link in my OP. But a quick google search will give you tons of information, what I included was the wiki page of Blackwater.

    I don't see how lawless forces used in combat "can be spun to anyones agenda". Could you please elaborate?

    And I do not claim the mercs are "evil". However, they have other instructions AND other options than normal soldiers. In effect, they can break the geneva rules of war whenever they want to without being held responcible.


    Evil_Maniac From Mars, first of all, as Koga mentioned, the state has already paid for the training. Secondly, the MAIN issue here is not cash, is it? Or is case more important to you than, oh say, laws of war and stuff?

    As CrossLOPER explained.

  6. #6
    Member Member Koga No Goshi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA, USA.
    Posts
    2,596

    Default Re: US use of "soldiers of fortune"

    Don't feel too isolated like this is Swede vs. America, Kadagar. I'm American and I agree Blackwater has no legitimate place in an occupation and the heavy use of Blackwater is less an issue of saving money-- more an issue of "selling the war on the false premise that it needed fewer troops" and pushing the "privatize the military" ideology.
    Koga no Goshi

    I give my Nihon Maru to TosaInu in tribute.

  7. #7
    Formerly: SwedishFish Member KarlXII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    San Diego, California, United States. Malmö/Gothenburg, Sweden. Cities of my ancestors and my favorite places to go!
    Posts
    1,496

    Default Re: US use of "soldiers of fortune"

    The problem is not just the taxpaying money, it is also, if I recall correctly, that Iraq has actually prohibited Blackwater from operating in the country, while the US has granted it legal immunity. If, what is essentially a mercenary coporation, is allowed to operate illegaly but with immunity, this creates a very strange and tense situation.


    Kadagar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_of_two
    HOW ABOUT 'DEM VIKINGS
    -Martok

  8. #8
    The Black Senior Member Papewaio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    15,677

    Post Re: US use of "soldiers of fortune"

    Quote Originally Posted by Kadagar_AV View Post
    papewaio, Indeed. As I said, murders are quite common in wars.
    Actually I maintain that it is possible for a solider to murder not that it is common.

    The hand grenade incident I was referring by the way was the My Lai Massacre... abnormal enough that it caused a court martial. Interesting part of it that for some reason leaving the military absolves one of all war crimes committed while in service... I'm sure the Nazi's in the Nuremburg trials and the Japanese Imperial soldiers in the Tokyo trials had wished that rule of law known to them.

    So I don't think that murders happen very often. I do think that a double standard is applied depending if you are prosecuting ones own vs another. That is a very human thing to do. And on top of that cover ups do happen, and even when exposed there is always pardons and the like.

    IMDHO the troops generally do the right thing. It is the law and the attempts to go by the letter to skirt justice by higher up in the command particularly the politicians who beat the drums of war that needs to be addressed more closely.
    Last edited by Papewaio; 10-10-2008 at 07:46.
    Our genes maybe in the basement but it does not stop us chosing our point of view from the top.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
    Pape for global overlord!!
    Quote Originally Posted by English assassin
    Squid sources report that scientists taste "sort of like chicken"
    Quote Originally Posted by frogbeastegg View Post
    The rest is either as average as advertised or, in the case of the missionary, disappointing.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO