Results 1 to 30 of 71

Thread: US use of "soldiers of fortune"

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #10
    Feeding the Peanut Gallery Senior Member Redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Denver working on the Railroad
    Posts
    10,660

    Default Re: US use of "soldiers of fortune"

    Quote Originally Posted by Koga No Goshi View Post
    I do not believe U.S. soldiers are generally murderers or seek to be such. But, laws and regulations are needed to ensure that behavior or tendency in some individuals is controlled or, as last resort, penalized and dealt with.
    Those laws and regulations exist - its called the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and the Rules of Engagement as established by the Chain of Command, (think high level). So I would suggest reading that document - its a fairly big one and easy to find on the Internet. Now if your arguement is that those laws and regulations should be enforced to the standards mentioned within the UCMJ
    and other Military doctrine and regulation manuals - your going to have to mention specific exambles.


    Legal immunity for private people doing some of the same jobs, at better pay, is horrible. And I've heard many resentful stories from guys who've served in the armed forces about Blackwater, and I don't blame them. I'd rather all that money go to the troops, either in care, better equipment, better pay, better benefits, sign on bonuses, whatever. Not to what is, legally, just a privately hired set of thugs who don't answer to anyone.
    Hince the statement I made about detesting Mercs greater then even Kadagar. When I was in we called them cowboys and tried to have nothing to do with them. Now my younger brother has to deal with them again and he detests them with an even greater passion then I do. So if Kadagar limited his comments to the sorry state of using Mercs I would have a tendency to either agree with his arguement or just stay silent, but calling soldier's murderer's as a generalization is beneath comtempt especially from someone that claims to have served.
    Last edited by Redleg; 10-10-2008 at 04:57.
    O well, seems like 'some' people decide to ruin a perfectly valid threat. Nice going guys... doc bean

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO