Quad/Triple Core CPUs..Will Empire be optimised?

[hellenes]

That is actually far better then I though you could get. That is cool.

I just tried 3 more battles.

First at 15,000 peasants lol. That battle had fairly smooth gameplay.

I then tried another battle with 18,000 troops and that was playable but had some lag.

And lastly I play with 24,000 troops and that is to laggy but I can control the units and all as it is still a few frames per second.

Mind you all games I play are at these settings of....

1920 x 1200

Shader 2, 8xAA, 16 X AF, Effects and unit detail at very high, Shadows at Extreme, everything else is at high (the highest possible).

I really got to say Extreme shadows are so much better then very high shadows.

Anyways my system spec is...

Intel core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 3.6ghz
4 GB of DDR2 @ 1066 mhz
4870 X2
Windows XP.

that card of yours and the CPU are 2008 monsters and they struggle to max out a 2006 game....
Heh and people still believe that Crysis is the most demanding game on the planet....

[Pinxit]

that card of yours and the CPU are 2008 monsters and they struggle to max out a 2006 game....
Heh and people still believe that Crysis is the most demanding game on the planet....

Yes, but that is quite unfair :: Crysis is more demanding in its own way. I mean, I am certain that Crysis would be unplayable if you were to fill the screen with 20,000 enemy soldiers, as would most games. Especially Crysis, I might add.

[Pinxit]

Yes, but that is quite unfair :: Crysis is more demanding in its own way. I mean, I am certain that Crysis would be unplayable if you were to fill the screen with 20,000 enemy soldiers, as would most games. Especially Crysis, I might add.

You make perfect sense. Although, I must add, it is still very remarkable that a game that was launched in 2006 cant be played fully even with todays best consumer hardware. Total War designed for the future? Maybe in 2012 I will be able to play Empire Total War without being limited by numbers.

[hellenes]

Yes, but that is quite unfair :: Crysis is more demanding in its own way. I mean, I am certain that Crysis would be unplayable if you were to fill the screen with 20,000 enemy soldiers, as would most games. Especially Crysis, I might add.

Crysis in its original form (no mods) and M2TW in its original form...M2TW is FAAAR MORE DEMANDING....
Custom battles
8 armies of 20x150 units each= 24000
Now kingdoms which is essentially the same game:
8 armies of 20x250 units each= 40000
MAYBE an 8 core CPU with 4 Dual core GPUs will run that at 30fps....Crysis cant even touch the level of hardware demand of TW series....

[Pinxit]

Crysis in its original form (no mods) and M2TW in its original form...M2TW is FAAAR MORE DEMANDING....
Custom battles
8 armies of 20x150 units each= 24000
Now kingdoms which is essentially the same game:
8 armies of 20x250 units each= 40000
MAYBE an 8 core CPU with 4 Dual core GPUs will run that at 30fps....Crysis cant even touch the level of hardware demand of TW series....

Well, yes, Im not arguing that it is not. Im simply making the point that when people say that Crysis is the most demanding game ever, they are refering to its demanding visuals, which far surpasses the visuals in any Total War game. My point being that even a 20 year old strategy game would be more demanding than Crysis if you allow enough units on the screen at the same time.

[Megas Methuselah]

Well, Caesar 2 is almost twenty years old. If you fought on the battle screen and used up to 100'000 men(you can't, but hypothetically speaking), I could still easily run it. It's a great game, btw...

[Pinxit]

Well, Caesar 2 is almost twenty years old. If you fought on the battle screen and used up to 100'000 men(you can't, but hypothetically speaking), I could still easily run it. It's a great game, btw...

If you cant test it than how do you know that you could easily run it with those settings?

Anyway, it doesnt matter since all that would prove is that 100,000 isnt "enough".

[Megas Methuselah]

I know, I'm just poking fun at you. But for an old game, those cheap low-end battles are extremely fun.

[hellenes]

Well, yes, Im not arguing that it is not. Im simply making the point that when people say that Crysis is the most demanding game ever, they are refering to its demanding visuals, which far surpasses the visuals in any Total War game. My point being that even a 20 year old strategy game would be more demanding than Crysis if you allow enough units on the screen at the same time.

that was my point out of the box M2TW is more demanding than crysis and has another kind of impressive visuals....more of an awe and epic effect...

[Belgolas]

Well funny how RTW I can't have as meny troops then M2TW and I still can't max out STW with out lag.

I can max Crysis on my rig but I can't max M2TW. BUT in M2TW campaing you never get 8 army battles anyway.