Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Roman commanders underestimated?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #4
    amrtaka Member machinor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Austria 'n Italy
    Posts
    464

    Default Re: Roman commanders underestimated?

    Didn't usual Roman battle strategy more or less consist of steamrolling the enemy army with the infantry mass? IIRC it was that strategy that Hannibal exploited in the Cannae.

    Also, one has to keep in mind, that most of the higher rank served in the army only for a relatively short term. So the real veterans were the soldiers and lower rank officers like the centurions. A wise commander would rely on them and their experience instead of his own dubious military knowledge.
    After all, there is a reason, a military commander would be pronounced 'Imperator' by the legion and not by the senat or the generals.
    Last edited by machinor; 11-01-2008 at 13:05.
    Quote Originally Posted by NickTheGreek View Post
    "Dahae always ride single file to hid their numbers, these tracks are side by side. And these arrow wounds, too accurate for Dahae, only Pahlavi Zradha Shivatir are so precise..."
    <-- My "From Basileion to Arche - A Makedonian AAR" Memorial Balloon.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO