Quote Originally Posted by Maion Maroneios View Post
I'm not saying blustering around, just using simple reason as well as known facts.
Stating your own highly debatable (and debated) opinions as inalienable facts = blustering.

Also, you might note that Centurio Nixalsverdrus was able to voice his similar concerns civilly (ie. without calling everyone else pie-in-the-sky fools).

Quote Originally Posted by Maion Maroneios View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Gleemonex
If it wasn't for a single roof tile, Epeirote fanboys would probably be calling a Roman Hegemony complete fiction. Your point?
This has absolutely nothing to do with what I say. Unless you can compare Makedonia-Sparte with Roma-Epeiros. If that is so, I think it was a mistake to even bother to reply to your bumbling.
Your homework for today is to read about the Butterfly effect. Extra credit if you can figure out how my statement has everything to do with what you say (and, indeed, warfare in general).

Quote Originally Posted by Maion Maroneios View Post
As I said before (but clearly you haven't well understood), I have stated my personal opinion.
Followed by:

Quote Originally Posted by Maion Maroneios View Post
I use reason and facts, while most others just throw out bold assumptions or fictional idealistic theories.
Quote Originally Posted by Celtic_Punk View Post
Well I'm still gunna do that AAR, its going to be an Alliance headed up by Sparta and Athens. We'll see where it goes though. I am planing on having a civil war between Sparta and Athens around the 200-150BC range too, and It'll end somewhere around 100BC.

What point of view should I write in in? I was thinking a Spartan hoplite from the Civil war era, and finished by his son.
That should be fun. What about an emancipated helot, and his son going through the agoge?

-Glee