BBC
Thoughts? I'm not sure if I feel comfortable with this - I don't think he should ever be released.
BBC
Thoughts? I'm not sure if I feel comfortable with this - I don't think he should ever be released.
Ideally he should be shot.
![]()
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
I'm reading the Communist Manifesto as I post here...
If he has only served the minimal sentence, why would he have to be released? Also how can someone who commits nine murders be released within his lifetime?
Last edited by Rhyfelwyr; 11-24-2008 at 23:26.
At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.
Five life sentences, so he gets about 5.2 years per life sentence?
And actually making him serve out his sentence wasn't?"A major consideration was the question of whether it could be feared that Christian Klar would commit significant criminal acts again," but the judges decided there was no evidence he would, the court said in a statement.
Stupid.
CR
Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
My first thought was "what in Heaven's name was the CO of the Royal Air Force being detained for?"
Then, after a quick scan at the OP, I realized both that my question ended in a preposition (poor form that) and the the RAF being addressed was what I always called Baader-Meinhoff.
Why that cretin should be released escapes me -- pardon the pun. Either you believe him to be a murdering thug, in which case you err on the side of caution and keep him jailed OR you believe him to be a revolutionary, in which case you must acknowledge that he lost his bid for power -- and the price for that is well known.
Neither view suggests this reject should ever need to see the outside of a cell again. On the other hand, if they'd really like to commute his sentence, I could suggest this....
Release him in the middle of the Eglund AFB swamps where our spec-forces folks train. Give him 24 hours and let the SEALS loose. If he can make it off the base he's free.
Then all we have to do make some popcorn and watch the predator footage.
"The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken
Parole should not be easily available for terrorism, mass-murder, serial killers, serial rapists... essentially any who would attack the state and/or multiple people.
They should prove not only that they have reformed, but that they are model prisoners and citizens to be. Any black mark and nope, try next time.
Make an example of them and err on the side of caution.
Most of the former RAF members have been released already. None have relapsed, and this doesn't seem very likely. Society has changed enourmously, radical left-wing terrorism is gone. All the sixties/seventies red terrorism groups have disbanded themselves, except where it is tied to territorial claims (ETA, somewhat the IRA).
Plus the Soviet Union and East Germany have no use for Western ideologues and useful idiots anymore.
Or, the third option, you believe society to be wrong. Which a lot of people believed. The RAF shook West Germany to the core, tested it to the limit. I think that about a third of Germans at the time did not see this episode in terms of terrorist thugs versus a legitimate state. This anti-capitalist democracy line of thinking has virtually disappeared. Together, it should be noted, with a lot of anti-democratic sentiment from the right.Either you believe him to be a murdering thug, in which case you err on the side of caution and keep him jailed OR you believe him to be a revolutionary
(On the downside, at least in the seventies anti-democracy usually implied one had read Marx and Adorno. Backwards. In a foreign language. Nowadays, anti-democratic usually means 'semi-literate internet populist'. O tempora, o mores...)
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." *Jim Elliot*
He shouldn't be released. He took lives and that is the worst thing that any human being can do.
Last edited by CountArach; 11-25-2008 at 00:57.
Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
I would say Germany has witnessed enough extreme leftwing versus extreme rightwing violence for the next thousand years. No need to turn him over to Nazis. Nazis have been the legitimisation for the RAF, Communism has been the legitimisation for the Nazis. Meanwhile, normal people are not heard over their exchanges of mutual insults and end up crushed in between.
How about we build a time machine, go back 150 years, and send all extremist Germans to Antarctica to wage their battles there?![]()
Last edited by Louis VI the Fat; 11-25-2008 at 01:18.
Germany's history might make the actions of the RAF more understandable, but not less culpable and dispicable. Christian Klar doesn't deserve to be set free, and neither did the other RAF members who have been released these past years.
Recidivism is just one factor that ought to be considered. I don't think the people involved are going to reorganize the RAF, but the only reason they've dismissed violence as a means to advance their views is because they now realize that the opportunity (if it ever existed) has long since passed.
I've read that he was involved in the decision to disband the RAF in 1998, wich is a valid reason if true. The article I read didn't have details but I'm sceptical of how useful his help was, especially because the RAF had practically stopped operating about two years after the reunification.
PS: can anyone tell me if Der Baader Meinhof Komplex is a good film?
Last edited by Kralizec; 11-25-2008 at 21:22.
Bookmarks