BBC
Thoughts? I'm not sure if I feel comfortable with this - I don't think he should ever be released.
BBC
Thoughts? I'm not sure if I feel comfortable with this - I don't think he should ever be released.
Ideally he should be shot.
![]()
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
I'm reading the Communist Manifesto as I post here...
If he has only served the minimal sentence, why would he have to be released? Also how can someone who commits nine murders be released within his lifetime?
Last edited by Rhyfelwyr; 11-24-2008 at 23:26.
At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.
Five life sentences, so he gets about 5.2 years per life sentence?
And actually making him serve out his sentence wasn't?"A major consideration was the question of whether it could be feared that Christian Klar would commit significant criminal acts again," but the judges decided there was no evidence he would, the court said in a statement.
Stupid.
CR
Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
My first thought was "what in Heaven's name was the CO of the Royal Air Force being detained for?"
Then, after a quick scan at the OP, I realized both that my question ended in a preposition (poor form that) and the the RAF being addressed was what I always called Baader-Meinhoff.
Why that cretin should be released escapes me -- pardon the pun. Either you believe him to be a murdering thug, in which case you err on the side of caution and keep him jailed OR you believe him to be a revolutionary, in which case you must acknowledge that he lost his bid for power -- and the price for that is well known.
Neither view suggests this reject should ever need to see the outside of a cell again. On the other hand, if they'd really like to commute his sentence, I could suggest this....
Release him in the middle of the Eglund AFB swamps where our spec-forces folks train. Give him 24 hours and let the SEALS loose. If he can make it off the base he's free.
Then all we have to do make some popcorn and watch the predator footage.
"The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman
"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken
Parole should not be easily available for terrorism, mass-murder, serial killers, serial rapists... essentially any who would attack the state and/or multiple people.
They should prove not only that they have reformed, but that they are model prisoners and citizens to be. Any black mark and nope, try next time.
Make an example of them and err on the side of caution.
He shouldn't be released. He took lives and that is the worst thing that any human being can do.
Last edited by CountArach; 11-25-2008 at 00:57.
Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
Most of the former RAF members have been released already. None have relapsed, and this doesn't seem very likely. Society has changed enourmously, radical left-wing terrorism is gone. All the sixties/seventies red terrorism groups have disbanded themselves, except where it is tied to territorial claims (ETA, somewhat the IRA).
Plus the Soviet Union and East Germany have no use for Western ideologues and useful idiots anymore.
Or, the third option, you believe society to be wrong. Which a lot of people believed. The RAF shook West Germany to the core, tested it to the limit. I think that about a third of Germans at the time did not see this episode in terms of terrorist thugs versus a legitimate state. This anti-capitalist democracy line of thinking has virtually disappeared. Together, it should be noted, with a lot of anti-democratic sentiment from the right.Either you believe him to be a murdering thug, in which case you err on the side of caution and keep him jailed OR you believe him to be a revolutionary
(On the downside, at least in the seventies anti-democracy usually implied one had read Marx and Adorno. Backwards. In a foreign language. Nowadays, anti-democratic usually means 'semi-literate internet populist'. O tempora, o mores...)
I would say Germany has witnessed enough extreme leftwing versus extreme rightwing violence for the next thousand years. No need to turn him over to Nazis. Nazis have been the legitimisation for the RAF, Communism has been the legitimisation for the Nazis. Meanwhile, normal people are not heard over their exchanges of mutual insults and end up crushed in between.
How about we build a time machine, go back 150 years, and send all extremist Germans to Antarctica to wage their battles there?![]()
Last edited by Louis VI the Fat; 11-25-2008 at 01:18.
The likelihood of reoffending should not even enter into the equation. The man tore families a part, murdered people in cold blood and his organization did so in excessively brutal ways. If there is one single person in the world who actually deserves Guantanumo, he is that person.
Send every extremist there. The KKK, Black Panthers, communists, Nazis, terrorist organizations everywhere, fence the whole continent off and let them sort themselves out.How about we build a time machine, go back 150 years, and send all extremist Germans to Antarctica to wage their battles there?
Last edited by Evil_Maniac From Mars; 11-25-2008 at 01:23.
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose." *Jim Elliot*
I wouldn't mind seeing him in Gitmo...
...together with all NPD members.
Imprisonment is for prevention and revenge. Prevention seems unnecessary. I just pointed it out for arguments sake.
More importantly for me is indeed revenge. Personally I have my usual dual thoughts. Half of me wants blood and revenge, half of me thinks releasing people in their fifties for what they did in their twenties is what a civilised society does.
Apart from this personal struglle, more in general, I think it is a commendable sign of German maturity that the RAF members have been mostly released by now. There is no more fear of them, no more breeding ground for them, no more East Germany to support them, and no more nazis to imprison them.
Im glad im not the only one who wondered what the royal air force boss had done!
If he isn't a threat anymore then i do see a good reason to release him, 26 years for 9 murders does seem a bit low, but if he's an old man that isn't a threat anymore is there really any need for more punishment...
In remembrance of our great Admin Tosa Inu, A tireless worker with the patience of a saint. As long as I live I will not forget you. Thank you for everything!
Ja Mata, Tosa.
The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder
Same response to the same topic posted here last time one of them was released .
Yes its terrible isn't it , but if you a do a deal with terrorists that offers early release in exchange for disbanding their group then they get early release .
It amazes me how many people express opinions about killing him. He certainly should not feel alone in this world...
...probably 90% of us would justify the killing of other people based on religious, ideological, moral and other grounds. Fortunatelly most of us are not paranoid enough/have the guts to act on such impulses.
Yes, the sentence is silly. Life imprisonment should mean life imprisonment or at least jail until he is too old and frail to kill. And he deserves a life sentence. But we have enough unjustified 'martyrs' in this world to add more.
Αξιζει φιλε να πεθανεις για ενα ονειρο, κι ας ειναι η φωτια του να σε καψει.
http://grumpygreekguy.tumblr.com/
Being from a country without life sentences, and supporting that, I find it very easy to give a definite "yes" on this.
I really don't see much sense in keeping people locked up for more than 20 years...
Last edited by HoreTore; 11-25-2008 at 08:00.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
The deal put forward by the german government in 92Which deal? I was under the impression that the group was officially disbanded in 1998 with this
He isn't even sorry for what he did.
Mohnhaupt didn't say sorry , she still got released .He isn't even sorry for what he did.
Look at all the terrorists released in the 6 counties , did they say sorry ?
Yeah they were that sadly makes it hard to keep this one locked up, but I don't think it's right to excuse someone for something he isn't really sorry about. They still stand firmly behind their actions, maybe it is to deny them some twisted sort of martyrship I don't know.
In Texas he would've been dead 24 years ago.
There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.
I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.
In Texas, he wouldn't have been in the first place.
Which I don't mean as a silly remark. This is rather basically what I meant in some of my earlier posts. The thought of a Texas RAF is as nonsensical as current Norwegian Lutheran terrorism. The RAF belonged to a specific place and a specific time.
There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.
I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.
Bookmarks