There was a big difference between the Indians in South and Central America and those of North America.
From the very beginning the North American Indians had successes in fighting off the Spanish. Hernando de Soto had a tough time of exploring and was close to being wiped out on several occasions. The Chickasaw had him and allowed him to go. We know what happened to early Viking attempts to settle and the lost colony of Rowatan. Guns, horses, and armor were not the magic in eastern North America that they were in the southwest and Central America.
Also this is a different time period. CA does do historical research. Just because they treated the Indians badly in Kingdoms does not mean that the same must hold true for Empire.
You also have to consider the US/Canadian markets, with people who have different expectations of Indian Warfare. People who still carry some of that historical fear of Indian Attack. It is in the physique.
It is also widely held that the only reason the European Immigrants won was the disunity of the Tribes.
If they nerff the Indians and do a poor job with them, there is going to be an outcry. If they are actually doing the 13 Colonies then they(the Indians) should be a major factor in success or failure. It would be like not having Elephants in India!
If it is bad I know I am going to scream! I suspect that others will too. Some of you are looking for George Washington, Wellington, or Nappy… I am looking for William Johnson, Pontiac and some others you won‘t know.
If they add areas outside Europe then they have to do them well. It can‘t just be Europe and those other places. Europeans may see the world that way but look at the markets.
North America must represent not less than 50% of the potential. I don‘t think they want to shoot themselves in the foot.
I am hoping for the best
If they don’t deliver than it may seem like a different Total War.
![]()
Bookmarks