Navigable Rivers?

[General Appo]

So none of you have experienced the massive joy that comes from fighting a bridge battle with Armoured Elephants on your side? Absolutely hilarious.

[satalexton]

I have....close enough at least. My elephants weren't armoured >_>

[Cartaphilus]

So none of you have experienced the massive joy that comes from fighting a bridge battle with Armoured Elephants on your side? Absolutely hilarious.

Yes, but repeating it turn after turn makes it less funny and finally boring.

[Subotan]

So none of you have experienced the massive joy that comes from fighting a bridge battle with Armoured Elephants on your side? Absolutely hilarious.

Yes, and when they die on the bridge itself, lulz ensues.

Yes, but repeating it turn after turn makes it less funny and finally boring.

When that happens, I go off and make a cup of tea, maybe read the newspaper. I come back and my phalaxes have chopped everything up

[antisocialmunky]

EB+BI+Swimming never gets old. Not only are bridges less important, but watching 1000 + bodies float down the Dnieper in the ensuing rout is pretty friggin hilarious.

[Gryffeth]

Well, what if some generals had a trait to move on rivers, as some generals probably couldn't 'manage' such a thing, or really never thought about it. In MTW2 when a general moved to the sea, he could buy a ship to sail on. What if the same concept was applied to a qualified general. When the general moves to the river, of course only the main rivers, he can go to his mercenary scroll and buy a ferry, or in 'reality', build one, and move on the river.