When bandwagon occurs, that means there were enough evidence or scumminess that everyone just piles on one fellow. Which means if you get bandwagon, its your fault for being scummy. Like Shlin said, I dont see how starting a bandwagoning is a bad thing.
This round gave us 3 suspicious players.
I cant see how not bolding the vote makes Quintus suspicious. Perhaps a little over defensive but thats about it.
Secondly GH who was accused to be controlling the discussion which I fail to see what is wrong with it. At least his giving us discussion, even though that has possibility of misleading. As for him voting for White_eyes last round, considering iirc GH has never played with White_eyes before White_eyes does seem extremely scummy although that is his natural playing style.
YLC I saw contradiction in your post saying "town lost without discussion." Isn't that what exactly GH is doing right now? Promoting discussion?
I am more weary of Reenk. Please explain why you voted for Seireikhaan and how he is acting suspicious.
Vote: Reenk
Quintus 2: (w&f, shlin)
shlin 2: (Chaotix, Quintus)
Beefy 1: (Tevash)
GH 1: (YLC)
seireikhaan: 1 (Reenk)
Reenk 2: (White_eyes, Beefy)
YLC 1: (khaan)
Tevash 1: (GH)
Bookmarks