Quote Originally Posted by Tribesman View Post
You're just upset because the group is run by the fruitcakes who wanted good "christians" to pray for rain when Obama was doing speeches .
"The group"? What?

Still its nice to see that all the law suits going back 4 years over this issue have now been piled into a class action .
But hold on , E-Harmony have agreed to go to mediation and appoint a mediator that both they and the plaintiffs will agree on to settle this case through arbitration in accordance with the laws of the land ....damn I could have sworn that only happened in Britain where they have come under the evil veil of Sharia law
Wow, that's a pointless laugh. Who said that they thought arbitration didn't occur in western countries?

An interesting view , so if I had a business and didn't build my business to allow disabled people access then in your book I could refuse service to disabled people without running the risk of getting sued for discrimination
No, you're misunderstanding.

In your example, by not having disabled access in your store you are denying those people access to the services or goods you provide. It's a question of access, and different from this case. The complaint against eharmony was never about gay people not being able to access the service, but that the services provided didn't extend as much as the gay complainant wanted. It'd be like a person in a wheelchair suing a moped/scooter store for not selling mobile electric wheelchairs.

Bloody hell rabbit , I hope you never consider starting your own company or you will spend a lot of time paying lawyers and getting very bad results .


CR