Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars View Post
This.

There is nothing wrong with proposing limits. Yes, immigrants should be allowed to live where they want in our country (when they can afford to find their own place to live, but that is another matter), but we don't have to let them in in the first place.

Give them a time limit to learn the language. If they cannot pass a competency test within a certain period of time, remove their legal right to remain in the country. The exception to this is if they have a legitimate fear of prosecution at home (in which case they should have claimed asylum in the first place). They should also be given a time limit to find a full time job. Remind me what the point is of taking them if they can't or won't work?
Correct. Quota systems are good.

The problem I have is when for example, some guy born in the UK is given more respect even if he is a bum, sponges off of society, and doesn't do anything all day. Then you have a hard working immigrant trying to learn the language the best he can just to survive. There is a fine line, but I think most of my constituents know that line.

The world revolves around incentives. If immigrants aren't working, assimilating or learning the language quickly enough (or idealy before they even emigrate) then you need to make an incentive for them to do so..i.e you have this much time to do this and this, and if you don't you are going back.