Having been busy with everything else I couldn't write any more of my AAR (for those of you that remember it). Hopefully once my creative writing course starts I could.

Now then onto the subject of the day.

I've been having a few MP games with my small forum group and watched them play in EB and it seems that to win 1/4 to 1/3 of your army have to be slingers with upgraded attacks.

...Doesn't that mean slingers are, in comparison with their historical counterparts, a bit overpowered? I was under the impression in Europe slingers and skirmishers started to become phased out due to advancements in archery. In any case having over 25% of an army being ranged troops is unhistorial...or is it?

What do you think?