Org Mobile Site
Thread: OOC Thread and Chatroom
1) I like this guys idea 
2)Cheers
3) I thought thats how you spelt Barber anyway..
4) Yeah Potocello.
...0?)
2)Cheers
3) I thought thats how you spelt Barber anyway..
4) Yeah Potocello.
...0?)
Originally Posted by :
Heres Blasio Reports the Front...
"Good senators of Roma,
It is indeed a most tragic day in for the entire Republic. Our great Consul Asina, as fallen taking the life of the brute Conan of Segesta himself. The battle was a rigorous and bloody victory. Our legions attacked both sides and on Consul Asina's flank he was mortally wounded whilst personally cutting Conan's throat. Legatus Cotta was awarded the high honor of Corona Civica for dragging Consul Asina from the battle.
Our surgeons did all they could, but the Consul's wounds were too severe. I will return to Roma soon, filled with nothing but the utmost sadness.
All necessary promotions will be handed out soon.
Your Heres Electus, Blasio"
Heres Blasio Reports the Front...
"Good senators of Roma,
It is indeed a most tragic day in for the entire Republic. Our great Consul Asina, as fallen taking the life of the brute Conan of Segesta himself. The battle was a rigorous and bloody victory. Our legions attacked both sides and on Consul Asina's flank he was mortally wounded whilst personally cutting Conan's throat. Legatus Cotta was awarded the high honor of Corona Civica for dragging Consul Asina from the battle.
Our surgeons did all they could, but the Consul's wounds were too severe. I will return to Roma soon, filled with nothing but the utmost sadness.
All necessary promotions will be handed out soon.
Your Heres Electus, Blasio"
Nice timing Tiberius, right as i finish updating the history you post a new story 
Close the poll! Thats one up for the reds...boo yah!
okay guys good to see such a mixed outcome polls are closed lets get this game back on a roll ill take the save momentarily...Football Playoffs ...American Football that is~
...American Football that is~Originally Posted by navarro951:
okay guys good to see such a mixed outcome polls are closed lets get this game back on a roll ill take the save momentarily...Football Playoffs...American Football that is~
oh yea, ill be watchingokay guys good to see such a mixed outcome polls are closed lets get this game back on a roll ill take the save momentarily...Football Playoffs
...American Football that is~
Originally Posted by navarro951:
Nice timing Tiberius, right as i finish updating the history you post a new story
Haha!Nice timing Tiberius, right as i finish updating the history you post a new story
I like writing about my guy - he just got the herbalist, so the story must be told!Originally Posted by Potocello:
oh yea, ill be watching
Go Steelersoh yea, ill be watching
Originally Posted by :
Edict 3.3 Yes- everyone, Ibn-Khaldun, Mooks, navarro951, Tribunus Tiberius Claudius Marcellus
Edict 3.3 No- Baen, desert, Il_Duce, Mjolnir, Potocello, SwissBarbar, The Celtic Viking
5-7 Outcome: Not Passed
I don't agree with this!Edict 3.3 Yes- everyone, Ibn-Khaldun, Mooks, navarro951, Tribunus Tiberius Claudius Marcellus
Edict 3.3 No- Baen, desert, Il_Duce, Mjolnir, Potocello, SwissBarbar, The Celtic Viking
5-7 Outcome: Not Passed
Blasio had higher Influence than 1. According to the Library he had it 3. Thus Edict 3.3 will be a tie, 7-7 and I tie braking vote must be cast by the Dictator.
And if we use currrent Influence when Blasio is Dictator then this Edict will most certainly pass!!
got bored and put pics under all the headings on the first pages of the Curia, stories, battle reports, and the forum romanum....still trying to find one for the Pomerium
Dont forget the Campus Martius
So, navarro, could you answer to my post??
Remind me why one persons vote counts 3?
Because he was Heres.
Check the Rules and Library.
Check the Rules and Library.
The edict failed. I supported it but its time to move on.
@ Ibn:Well for the sake of this being a Republic and knowing that Dentatvs would die soon and knowing how many senators opposed the idea, i said specifically that i would not override anyone's vote and keep it a fair 1 vote per person. You have to consider that in this time, technically, a dictator nor an heres even existed. But as they are an in-game part, I like to acknowledge the fact that they are there
Originally Posted by navarro951:
@ Ibn:Well for the sake of this being a Republic and knowing that Dentatvs would die soon and knowing how many senators opposed the idea, i said specifically that i would not override anyone's vote and keep it a fair 1 vote per person. You have to consider that in this time, technically, a dictator nor an heres even existed. But as they are an in-game part, I like to acknowledge the fact that they are there
The fact that the Influence is in the Rules then we must obey the rules and thus the votes need to be checked again. @ Ibn:Well for the sake of this being a Republic and knowing that Dentatvs would die soon and knowing how many senators opposed the idea, i said specifically that i would not override anyone's vote and keep it a fair 1 vote per person. You have to consider that in this time, technically, a dictator nor an heres even existed. But as they are an in-game part, I like to acknowledge the fact that they are there
The next time we have a controversial Edict I could demand the same thing that everyones votes should be 1.
If it is in the Rules then we must follow the Rules.
I dont agree with that. 1 person 1 vote. Everyone agrees on that, even you, so theres no point in continuing with the rule.
Originally Posted by Ibn-Khaldun:
The fact that the Influence is in the Rules then we must obey the rules and thus the votes need to be checked again.
The next time we have a controversial Edict I could demand the same thing that everyones votes should be 1.
If it is in the Rules then we must follow the Rules.
I agree with this. If you want a rule changed, that's what CAs are for. No CA used, no rule changed, and it's still valid and should be followed. The fact that the Influence is in the Rules then we must obey the rules and thus the votes need to be checked again.
The next time we have a controversial Edict I could demand the same thing that everyones votes should be 1.
If it is in the Rules then we must follow the Rules.
However, if the result was 7-7 then the edict still failed, as rule 3.3 states:
Originally Posted by :
3.3 Edicts
Edicts require a simple majority of votes to pass and remain in effect until the next normal session of the Council.
Tied Edicts fail. If contradictory Edicts are passed, the one with the most votes takes priority.
Or am I missing something here?3.3 Edicts
Edicts require a simple majority of votes to pass and remain in effect until the next normal session of the Council.
Tied Edicts fail. If contradictory Edicts are passed, the one with the most votes takes priority.
Originally Posted by Mooks:
I dont agree with that. 1 person 1 vote. Everyone agrees on that, even you, so theres no point in continuing with the rule.
But before we could follow this '1 person 1 vote' thing we must change our current rules with a Charter Amendment. Unless that is not done then we have to follow our current rules where some persons have more Influence.I dont agree with that. 1 person 1 vote. Everyone agrees on that, even you, so theres no point in continuing with the rule.
Gah! TCV is right about that 'Tied Edicts fail' part. Don't know how I missed that one! 
senators with great influence and rhetoric skills could always make the difference, and mighty men could influence others by their opinion, i think the system is not bad as it is. A vote from one man is not = a vote from the other man (note, that in my opinion, there are far more senators, than players that roleplay senators. Man with great influence assure the votes of more of those non-player senators)
well when dentatvs was alive it would still end up a tie so it would fail anyway...from here on i will tally the "over 1" influence
Originally Posted by Mooks in the Curia:
OOC: maybe we can get rid of the office of faction leader/heres completely? Make it so we dont even recongize it, and its just a useless ingame thing. We are roleplaying here after all, and romans despised monarchys.
I have actually been playing Pvblivs as passively rebelling against this by refusing to even mention the dictator's rank, because I've always agreed with your sentiment, and still do now. If removing them completely won't happen, then I think that the heir should at least be elected.OOC: maybe we can get rid of the office of faction leader/heres completely? Make it so we dont even recongize it, and its just a useless ingame thing. We are roleplaying here after all, and romans despised monarchys.
By the way, a question: now that Cicero is the heir, will he still be serving as my tribunus?
well no, but im also still waiting to see who else wishes to challenge or side with the decision
@Mooks: I feel the same as well so for now thats how it stays if i come up with a better system then well use it.
@Mooks: I feel the same as well so for now thats how it stays if i come up with a better system then well use it.
I mean in actuality ya Dictators were only 6 month things. And not everything were doing in this game is entirely factual, I think mostly actually , so i guess our dictator terms are like Julius Caesars term hehe
, so i guess our dictator terms are like Julius Caesars term heheOriginally Posted by navarro951:
well no, but im also still waiting to see who else wishes to challenge or side with the decision
@Mooks: I feel the same as well so for now thats how it stays if i come up with a better system then well use it.
I think the better system is the one I suggested. The faction heir/king really messes up the roleplaying aspect of this game. Your basically a dungeon master as of now. Just make it a useless in-game trait and asssign it to the oldest character.well no, but im also still waiting to see who else wishes to challenge or side with the decision
@Mooks: I feel the same as well so for now thats how it stays if i come up with a better system then well use it.
I was sort of thinking that the faction leader be like the senator with the most power in Rome or something...need a name for it. And the Heir would be his closest friend in politics.
Navarro, whats your opinion on accurately recruiting for rome's legions?
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=101787
The link is a guide for historically accurate rome playing. The consular armies (Early ones) were half italic allies of Rome and half fully roman soldiers.
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=101787
The link is a guide for historically accurate rome playing. The consular armies (Early ones) were half italic allies of Rome and half fully roman soldiers.
ya im aware of the historical recruitment...its the money thats been a problem
Okay im thinkin this:
The Dictator will now be what EB names it
Primvs Inter Pares
So hell be more of a "Figure head" or a "grandfather" some one the senators can look to.
and then the Imperii Heres Electus will be the person who is next in-line for the Primvs Pares. So therefore, no one is really Heir to the throne or dictator, they are just notable men. Also, the Heres can be changed depending on how the Curia sees fit to be the next Primvs Pares so it is never a definite thing.
The Dictator will now be what EB names it
Primvs Inter Pares
So hell be more of a "Figure head" or a "grandfather" some one the senators can look to.
and then the Imperii Heres Electus will be the person who is next in-line for the Primvs Pares. So therefore, no one is really Heir to the throne or dictator, they are just notable men. Also, the Heres can be changed depending on how the Curia sees fit to be the next Primvs Pares so it is never a definite thing.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO