OOC Thread and Chatroom

[mini]

They don't have to. Anything that contradicts the rules are against the rules. Since the rules aren't followed, it should be obvious that edicts that contradict them are invalid.
it not against the rules to contradict edicts, because it isnt stated :)






This is a non sequiteur if I ever saw one. That you have no benefit from the creation of the house does not mean that you're incapable of proposing something that is against the rules.
I propose to Mooks to do it as such. I myself have DONE NOTHING at this point, simply beyond stating that if he wants to have a chance, he should do it as such. I haven't proposed anything IC, ergo I have nto broken any rules nitwit.



What you would vote for doesn't mean a thing since such an edict would be invalid. It's not a personal thing, it's just the rules.
Again, there is no legal point stating a contradictionary edict is invalid.



As I've already said, you're dead wrong. The * only marks which rules you can modify through a Charter Amendment and which you cannot. That's it. It doesn't mean you get to ignore the others, with or without an edict.
Again, the Senate (and congressional Session) IS A DEMOCRACY. Which means you can put anything you want to the vote. And since there is nothing in the constitution (in the rules) that say that edicts which contradict the rules are invalid, this issue can be put to the vote.

1) if you want contradictionary edicts invalid, make a CA to add it to the rules. As logn as it's not forbidden, it is allowed. That's a worldwide fact.

2) Stop accusing me of breaking the rules. I have done nothing IC which gives you the right to accuse me of such a thing. Beyond some sound advie to Mooks, I have done nothing wrong here. So I appreciate you ceasing your personal assaults, thankyouverymuch.

3) Roman law has NUMEROUS occassions were older laws were looped around in new laws for specifik reason, without removing the older law or invalidating the new law. It was what distinguished the intelligent from the others, that they found loopholes around things that stood in their way of achieving their goal.
Current history isn't much better on that point. This PBM is not based on fantasy, but tries to relive history a little bit. Ergo we should act like it.

4) keep the game a little bit dynamic ffs. Otherwise we might go play chess instead for some real excitement.