OOC Thread and Chatroom

[Potocello]

we don't need to proceed historically accurate concerning expansion, or do we? we could have a greek or Iberian war first, if we wanted

personally, i don't think we should have to but some may want to stick to it for historical purposes.

[/Bean\]

We shouldnt unless we're dictating the moves of the other factions, and we're not...so we should proceed how we want to

[Potocello]

you should post that you're taking the save/done with the save in the dictator and consul's reports, but I suppose potocello already done that for you. anyway I don't think much has to be done as CoL now since we're not like recruiting multiple legions or in a civil war.
Speaking of civil war, I can't wait for houses to be formed, then we could see a bit more action

is it possible to have civil wars in RTW?

We shouldnt unless we're dictating the moves of the other factions, and we're not...so we should proceed how we want to

that would be the most sensible

[/Bean\]

By civil wars, I think Navarro would most likely have the Provincial Dictator(s) that are rebelling have complete control over their armies outside their province(s), and then play the battle on custom, or multiplayer

[The Celtic Viking]

We shouldnt unless we're dictating the moves of the other factions, and we're not...so we should proceed how we want to

My sentiment exactly. Railroading is the perfect opposite of roleplaying, and it's no fun, nor is it even historically faithful either for that matter. We're not given the exact same situations that the Romans were in history, so doing what they did simply because that's what they did doesn't make much sense. It's better to play it in a way you think your avatar would act in the situation the game does throw you in. That's what roleplaying is all about, after all.