OOC Thread and Chatroom

[The Celtic Viking]

And you can say what you want, but it is not a breaking of the rules. it is working with the tools of law.

The rules DO NOT SPECIFY that edicts which contradict rules are invalid.

They don't have to. Anything that contradicts the rules are against the rules. Since the rules aren't followed, it should be obvious that edicts that contradict them are invalid.

So it's not breaking of the rules. Point finale.

Yes, it is. Point finale.

Besides, I have no benefit with the creation of this house, so I would like you stop saying that I ignore the rules.

This is a non sequiteur if I ever saw one. That you have no benefit from the creation of the house does not mean that you're incapable of proposing something that is against the rules.

I have done nothign here, I'm just giving Mooks a way to achieve his goals.

And frankly, if he goes for it, i'll give him my vote simply to spite you.

What you would vote for doesn't mean a thing since such an edict would be invalid. It's not a personal thing, it's just the rules.

If you want to match this to the US constitution, the CORE RULES (rules with an * in front of it) would be the constitution.

All the other rules are just laws enacted later.

As I've already said, you're dead wrong. The * only marks which rules you can modify through a Charter Amendment and which you cannot. That's it. It doesn't mean you get to ignore the others, with or without an edict.