OOC Thread and Chatroom

[/Bean\]

Same here, I'm off. Laterz all. Twas a good session tonight

[Tiberius Claudius Marcellus]

I've PMed Navarro to request that I implement an event, which is legal as I have not been requested to implement one in the past 10 turns and there are no rules stating we cannot have more than one event in effect at the same time.

As I understand the rule:

1.5 Events

Whenever they desire, but no more often than once every 10 turns, navarro951, or anyone he choose's may create an in-game Event.
Events are not limited in scope, subject matter, or method of implementation.
All game rules, including * marked rules, can be violated to implement an Event.
The players can prevent the implementation of any single Event through a simple majority of unweighted votes.

It is worded so that each player could be chosen at the same time to implement an event, however, not more than once per player per 10 turns.

[SwissBarbar]

It says "navarro, or anyone he chooses" which means that only he, or one instead of him, can implemet an event every 10 turns. This again means, that only one event (the one of navarro or the one of the person he chooses)can be created per 10 turns.

At least that's how I understand it.

[SwissBarbar]

Sorry for the double post:

After having read your argument in the curia, I now know why you want to implemet an event.

And:

"I am not making the decision to spawn an army, I suggested it as Role Play. As such, I think we should vote on it in the senate. I may request to make an event out of it and force you to fight them though, if you really insist on being a bugger about it."

1. Don't you please call me a bugger in OOC.
2. Then we should make a law, which tells navarro to spawn a 3/4 stack every single time a legion enters a foreign region, just to RP the rebelling peasants. This would be the only logical consequence, since we cannot just put stacks in the way of your political enemies and not in yours.

[navarro951]

It says "navarro, or anyone he chooses" which means that only he, or one instead of him, can implemet an event every 10 turns. This again means, that only one event (the one of navarro or the one of the person he chooses)can be created per 10 turns.

At least that's how I understand it.

you understand correctly. Besides an event is on going (the punic war) that still has a second phase to be implemented. That would be the part where Rome gains sicilia as it should at the end of the first punic.

[/Bean\]

I do have to agree here, TCM. The event your planning is due to an increase in resistance that Tiberivs Marcellvs wants Caivs Avrelivs to face. That is not grounds for initiating an event that requires complete enemy involvment, if you get me. Sorry, keep trying

[Tiberius Claudius Marcellus]

- Bugger was directed at Bean, not you since he said "you can't decide that" in his post.
I'm taking that bugger must mean something different in Europe than it does in America. Here it means "an annoying little sh..".




- Ok, Navarro, the rules weren't as clear as they're being re-worded now; but you're the boss and if you now decide that only one event can go at a time, even though it isn't written that way, then that's the way it goes.

The correct way to read the rule in American English, as it is written at this time, is that either Navarro or someone he chooses can make an event not more than once per 10 turns.

That is to say that the only people who can make events are Navarro or whomever he chooses

and

both he and whomever he chooses can make said events only once each per 10 turns.

Therefore

the number of active events per every 10 turns can be "Number of players + 1 for navarro"




- Planning an event to impede a character is just as fair as planning an event to benefit yourselves. This whole event with the Punic War is all an attempt to advance Legios I and II at the expense of Legio III and all the new players. Bean has advanced far beyond all the other players and in talking with them, I know that several players think that the game is getting unbalanced and he needs to be nerfed until more can catch up and even the playing field. We don't take issue with him or anyone else being ahead; but with how far he is ahead.

He's the only character that can create a house, so he alone can start a civil war. And while any victim's of his may defend themselves, they can't initiate the attacks when he's leaving himself all alone fighting enemy kings and vulnerable. There needs to be some serious game reform to re-balance it or else it isn't fun and there's no sense in playing.

[SwissBarbar]

I translate it as "as***le" , but since I'm not a native speaker ....

[everyone]

darn I just sleep for 6 hours and go to school for 9 hours and a load of stuff happens again.

I think navarro's CA during the previous congressional session needs to be clarified; I originally interpreted it as "A quaestor my create a house via an edict during a congressional session; without the sponsoring of a praetor"; such as "edict 100.56473: The House of Juggling Mans That Look Like This: shall be created". and so it is created normally like how a house would be if a praetor sponsors it.

advance Legios I and II at the expense of Legio III

actually, the Sicily part was to help whichever legion which does not have any duties; which happen to be Legio III and IV. because when I asked navarro to implement the second phase, Legio II was already preoccupied in Illyria.

[mini]

He's the only character that can create a house, so he alone can start a civil war. And while any victim's of his may defend themselves, they can't initiate the attacks when he's leaving himself all alone fighting enemy kings and vulnerable. There needs to be some serious game reform to re-balance it or else it isn't fun and there's no sense in playing.

Well, if my ranking reforms go through, he'll be less ahead than he is now :)