
Originally Posted by
everyone
what is the point of all this bickering mini? just because we can get some 'historical accuracy'? or because we can give the AI a chance?
nonsense!
even the other mega PBMs don't do that; if we are to stick with historical accuracy, this game would get boring; if we keep changing our legions and stuff, it would also get boring from the amount of marching around and move_character-ing we have to do, and keeping track of every legion's progress.
you may counter this argument by making an exaggerated statement like "then we might as well let everybody be consuls" or "well let's just create a hundred legions and steamroll everything". but that's also absurd. there needs to be balance between historical accuracy and making the game playable, without making it too slow or fast; and that should in the end be decided by the GM, for navarro's probably the one who knows what this game should be.
and it's the CoL who does disbanding and such, not the CoF.
Bookmarks