Number of turns?

[Megas Methuselah]

...but they should give you a choice like they did in Rome-

They didn't give us a choice in Rome. They backed us into a corner and forced us to play 2tpy.

I think you're talking about the long and short campaign choice. They're both 2tpy anyways...

[Lord Nelson]

I have to say they are rather slow on letting the information flow, I expected a bit more to come out of the old website. I cant help feeling they are enjoying our suffering and speculation a bit too much

[Megas Methuselah]

I am inclined to agree. Moreover, I believe they are running behind schedule and don't have time to give us our rightfully-earned salt's worth of information. That, or they could just be whipping together a demo. Come what may, this lack of information is killin' me.

[Oleander Ardens]

4 turns would fit very well the limited timeframe in the game and make most sense gameplay wise, being intuitive, allowing for greater variability in the weather and climate and makes a campaign not overly long.

I would also like the ability to use 2 and 6 turns, if possible.

[Papewaio]

I wouldn't mind either a 4 turn seasonal campaign as per Shogun. Terrifying Monks in Fog or Rain.

Or one that has more turns in the 'nicer seasons'
Winter 1 turn.
Autumn & Spring 2 turns.
Summer 3 turns.
For 8 turns in total.

=][=
Food and logistics would be nice to have, after all winter had as much to do with defeating Napoleon as strategic decisions.

[IsItStillThere]

Since ETW will be covering a much shorter timespan than M2TW (only 100 years apparently), it only seems to make senese to have more than 2 turns a year in ETW so the game will last an appropriate number of turns. Four seems good.

[Fisherking]

Tada!

At this moment in time 2 turns and 12 turns are tied in the poll with 6 votes each!

And 4 turns per year only has 39 votes!

What ever are we to make of that? Hummmmmm!?