a shame. the NYT used to be a respectable paper in my eyes...
a shame. the NYT used to be a respectable paper in my eyes...
On the Path to the Streets of Gold: a Suebi AAR
Visited:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hvil i fred HoreToreA man who casts no shadow has no soul.
I still the times (in general) is a well written newspaper which is interesting to read. This one thing isn't going to change my mind.
Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
How could they even think this is real?Originally Posted by The Letter
What sloppy journalism!
More interesting to me, is what this affair reveals about the opinion of the NYT, of leftist - I shall be generous: intellectual - Americans about the French: meddlesome pests, imposing of their own values, which they hold for the highest standards.
The letter follows the exact pattern of what an American thinks the stereotypical Frenchman thinks about America: it starts with an expression of admiration for America's ideals and Constitution, then moves on to a fierce criticism of current American political practices, and ends with the - gleeful or not - note that 'America is in decline'.
All of which, upon reflection, makes me think the NYT has the French spot on actually.
Americans and their French fascination, as much a source of endless wonder and amusement as the reverse. American thought about France wavers between admiration and disgust. With both feelings based on some of the exact same (imaginary) elements of France: cultured, sophisticated, haughty, and ever snobbish over the absense of any of these characteristics in America.
France here, moves away from the real to the realm of the Imaginary Other. This imaginary construct of France in American thought can be invoked either as support for or criticism against a political position. For example, Bush reinforced his Iraq policy by juxtapositioning himself against the effeminate French. Leftist, liberal Americans often invoke France, and by extention 'Europe', to show that their position isn't obscure, but is considered the norm elsewhere.
In this case, though I must admit the story largely eludes me, nor do I have the interest to remedy that, as a guess I would think that the NYT was all too eager to show their readership that for the French, a republican (anti-monarchical here) hotbed to boot, the dynastical candidacy of Kennedy is obviously a travesty. (Of course, few here have ever heard of her, fewer still could care any less). This in a hastily embraced opportunity to boost the NYT's position.
Of course. If not simply an American with common sense, certainly everybody with even a remote knowledge of Delanoë or of French political customs will recognise the letter as a forgery immediately. Maybe the NYT could've send it to their correspondent in Paris for verification?News of the hoax was first reported by France-Amerique, which published a story on its Web site Monday. Editor-in-chief Jean-Cosme Delaloye said an employee of the French language monthly, which is based in New York City, read it Monday morning and was skeptical.
Last edited by Louis VI the Fat; 12-24-2008 at 01:01.
Hey Louis , is that why the Fox news anchor said bugger off France , keep your nose out of our business ?Americans and their French fascination
Though of course that was sloppy journalism and it hapened before they checked the source![]()
what? r u talking to me?Pics or it didn't happen.
Last edited by Hooahguy; 12-23-2008 at 21:09.
On the Path to the Streets of Gold: a Suebi AAR
Visited:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Hvil i fred HoreToreA man who casts no shadow has no soul.
Bookmarks