Quote Originally Posted by KukriKhan View Post
We assume. We agree. We conclude. But we do not - can not - know.
That sounds all mystical and deep and all but it overlooks the obvious assumption that you know that you cannot know.

Obviously, that means you think you know something, and are arguing that it is possible to know something, because you're attempting to convince someone of your viewpoint.

Basically, it's self-defeating logic. I didn't have to come up with a rebuttal, because it crumbles under it's own rules.