The Scourge of Ephesus [Concluded]

[GeneralHankerchief]

My case against you is twofold here, and you are missing the boat on what I was arguing. My point is this: you lodged an early, supposedly random vote. You proceed to argue with other players. You then moan and whine and hiss about wanting the round to end. TC rightfully complains about getting railroaded for no reason, and then you blast him for it and claim, after you proclaimed to want the round to end, that you were considering to unvote TC. At some point, you are lying here. Further, the lynching of TinCow means he cannot be exonerated through a night killing. Hence, for a mafioso, the successful lynch of such a good player right at the beginning of the game is a stroke of genius. Tell me, should we ever let you or Seamus or Sigurd or Andres be the victim of a "random" lynch on day one, with little to go on? Of course not, if they are townspeople they are quite helpful. TC is in this same boat. Day one is NOT the time to lynch such skilled players. And I believe you know this just as well as anyone else here. Further, if you hadn't intended to get TC lynched, why did you vote him in the first place?

Okay, say for example you vote for somebody in the first round (this is purely hypothetical, of course, since you didn't vote in the first round). Do you intend for him to be lynched? No, you intend to get the round over with and then move on.

You'll have to explain this further to me. Exactly why do you not go after the one who you deem suspicious, and instead vote a player you claimed was "helping". I am failing to see the logic here.

Because Sigurd wasn't going to get lynched that round, and at that point I had nothing more than a gut feeling against him. I figured my vote would be more useful pressuring people to defend themselves.

There's a problem, however. Sigurd ACKNOWLEDGED his mistake and declared that he stood corrected here. Yet you still did not recognize this fact. Again, I believe you are intentionally doing your best to take down innocent vets, so as to cast doubt upon any potential suspicion they might lodge towards you.

I didn't buy it.

Again, you're missing the boat on my argument. The point was, there should have at some point been a writeup of a successful block becaus there's been so many kills.

I believe what I've been more successful at has been preventing people from going out and killing in the first place rather than actually preventing a kill itself.

Indeed there was an old man. However, you'll have to excuse me as I suspend disbelief that you have no idea why it wasn't "successful".

Oh for crying out loud, how many times do I need to refer you to the writeups? Whenever the old man's been mentioned he's been frazzled and scared. You're going to be served a big helping of crow at the end of this game, my friend.

You woke up at noon?

It was the weekend, and I'm at school. Of course I woke up late.

You mean the part about how you wanted Reenk lynched without having to actually vote him yourself?

Do you actually have a case for why that's scummy or are you just going to bring it up offhand like that? If you were in my position you would have done the exact same thing.