I voted TC very early on in the round, not expecting him to get railroaded. I was contemplating changing my vote for a while (when I saw the votes on him pile up), but didn't like the way he reacted to the railroading. Thus, my vote stayed.Again, you ignore my point that TC is NOT the kind of player we want getting railroaded by a first round vote. I do NOT think this was a random vote. You even nominated TinCow in the HOF, stating you "feared" him more than anyone else. And sorry for not voting. I deemed it unimportant at the time due to Golden Rule/Chicago/Rl competing with the first round of a mafia game where an innocent is *almost* always lynched.
For the benefit of the rest of the town.Again, what is the point in pressuring a person you deem to be "helpful" to defend themselves?
It's very easy as a mafioso to attack someone based on false reasoning, get called out on it, and then back off, saying "whoops!". It even makes them look innocent. I've used that trick in the past. So no, I didn't buy it.You didn't buy Sigurd admitting he was wrong?
Note the "I believe" part of my post.And how can you know that for sure?
Reenk needed to be taken out for everyone's benefit. You yourself admit this. I feard some sort of beyond-the-grave retribution. Had I been a townie, I would have voted for him. But I'm not, so I didn't.It's scummy because you're trying to set up the lynch of yet another veteran player while trying to not look like you were angling hard for it.
Bookmarks