Re: The Scourge of Ephesus (IN PLAY)
Well, after those huge analysis posts I am probably not in danger of being lynched this round, but nonetheless I am now seen as scummy by at least one person, so I'll have to provide a defense for myself.
Alright. The main reason why I am so irregular with voting rounds is because... well, I have an irregular schedule. I am still in high school, and so generally I don't get home till 4 every weekday, and sometimes not until 7 if I have one of my various after-school practices. Add on to that homework, studying for tests, and reports, and I don't have a whole lot of free time. I may have a lot of homework one day, and the next I may not. There's really no predicting it. That free time that I do have is not always spent here, either- I do have a life and other things to do.Originally Posted by Seamus Fermanagh
In fact, I could use today as an example. I got home roughly an hour and a half ago (7:00 my time) and have 2 essays due tomorrow, one of which I haven't started yet. So I find myself conflicted as to how much longer I should actually spend writing this lengthy defense post.
As for votes:
Day 1- Nothing wrong with that vote, I suppose?
Day 2 I missed outright due to homework.
Day 3- You are right, I was online earlier this day, and got sidetracked (I honestly can't remember exactly what now that it's been about a week). I planned on returning later to vote, and you'll notice I did, but had missed the deadline by about an hour or two (I think.) That's why I had cause for the "dammit".
Day 4- I voted for Jolt, as I believe I said, because he had contradicted himself, and made it seem it was obvious he was innocent because he had not been there, something I found scummy. Additionally, it was pure chance he was lynched.
Day 5- I did not have time to read through the thread and vote intelligently, but I did not want to WoG'ed for missing another round. Hence the abstain.
Day 6 was hectic. I had a lot of time, as it was the weekend, and so I changed my vote multiple times as new suspects appeared to me. My vote on I-K was because of his behavior, which was universally suspicious looking, if perhaps "noobish". Voting Caius was just humoring GH because I thought he had some sort of plan. I intended to, and did change it later, when he did not respond. My vote on seireikhaan- the way I saw it, either GH or khaan was going to be lynched that day. GH had a much better track record than khaan, and khaan looked fairly suspicious with his huge accusation post out of nowhere- I decided it would be best if GH remained alive, and so I voted khaan to ensure his survival. Who would you have picked between the two?
As for my using the phrase "Day Phase" and not "Night Phase": Are you just looking for more little reasons to lynch me? Generally speaking, a townie cannot "miss" a night phase because there is nothing for him to miss. I said "Day Phase" because that's when I should have been active to vote.
And finally, as for the surprise attack on Seamus: Killing you wouldn't have shut you up. In fact, it probably would have made you more against me. Thus, if I even were a mafia, killing you would still have not been in my favor. Surely you realize this?
Phew. Is that enough 'splaining for ya? I'll be off to go do my essays, and I may be on later to vote. Until then, Vote: Abstain
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks