I'been doubl'cross'd!
Alls I wanted was to hustle pool and swindle...
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
I'been doubl'cross'd!
Alls I wanted was to hustle pool and swindle...
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
This is getting pretty critical....
Vote: YLC
Its gotta be either him or Andres, I can't see the other two being mafia. Tiberus is too inactive, and ATPG has been offline for the last couple of days, he can still sent in the order via e-mail, but knowing him he wouldn't blank out on the guild just to do this.
I want to hear some defence, you and Andres are all equally suspcious.
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
YLC was gunnin' fer me the whole time...
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
Meaning that....Originally Posted by Reenk Roink
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
Last edited by Thermal; 01-20-2009 at 00:11.
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
Hmm...
Vote: Andres
I'm "Foot and a Half" George, and I had two functions in this game - protect CountArach, and to be able to Vig kill once per night. Lynch me if you want, however I'm not your man. In fact, do so -I was planning on killing Andres tonight - if it's you QJC, then you basically win, and my hat is off to you. However, if I die, then you can't win - there will still be too many players.
That's if your Mafia.
Last edited by ULC; 01-20-2009 at 00:22.
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
Wait a minute. CountArach died last night.
Are you able to 1) kill and 2) protect each night, or can you do only one thing?
If so, who did you kill last night and why?
I've seen many mafiosi claim vigilante before. It's one of the most convenient role claims for scum.
Vote : YLC
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
Indeed it is, I was half tempted at one point or another to claim it in Golden Rule.
No, indeed, I did not protect CountArach except on the first night. I then killed boudica and Reenk Roink, and intended to kill you this night. So your assertion is correct, I may only protect or kill, not both.
Both of my kills were motivated by my own suspicions, gut feelings, nothing more. Last night, It was either you or Reenk Roink, and a coin flip decided it.
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
So, you're a vigilante on a killing spree based on "gut feelings"
And you're able to protect, but only CA and nobody else?
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
If you choose to vig kill Andres is it 100% certain chance of success, or is there any possibilty he might survive the attempt?
I'm starting to buy into YLC's story, Andres isn't scummy but YLC seems convincing. Right now I can think of a few possibilities the end will end... But anyway for now I will vote: Andres
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
Oh come on now. If he's CA's bodyguard then why didn't he protect him the last few nights?
What a great bodyguard he is, letting his protégé die last night.
And on top of that the vigilante claim, the ideal cover for a mafioso.
Andres is our Lord and Master and could strike us down with thunderbolts or beer cans at any time. ~Askthepizzaguy
Ja mata, TosaInu
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
To be honest I am relatively undecided at the moment. I had a nice plan as well; We could lynch Tiberus this round, making YLC the vig killer kill you (Andres) next night, and if the game still doesn't end then we'll lynch YLC in the final round. But now with APTG suddenly revealing his rouge aligance, the plan has all but evaporated into thin air.
Sometimes you have to go with gut feelings, if we lynched you and you turned out to be townie then I'm sorry, but now is the time to be decisive.
YLC also didn't have to reveal his vig/protector status if he didn't want to, telling people that he's actually a vigillante would make him seem suspcious and he had better alternatives to go with if he was mafia, I am beginning to think what YLC is saying is the truth.
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
Yes, guys: I want to say it right here, right now:
I consider not being here at all to be a coward's tactic. I would not do that just for the sake of winning a game.
Whenever I am mafia, I talk and talk. If I win using such a tactic, dear god... I get bragging rights, don't I? I will not blank out on my favorite website just to win the game the WOG-bait way.
Sorry I haven't been more active, but whenever I am here, I am active, and it is in my best interests not to pick a side in this game, as I mentioned a few dozen times.
I mentioned I might be dropping out of mafia games in the future, due to the fact that me not being here and there still being murders eliminates me as a potential suspect in some games. This is not true in games where I can send in orders ahead of time, and if my partner(s) can kill in my place.
I admit, if I survive this game at all, I will be impressed by your faith in me after my past deviousness, and thank everyone for letting me live. Of course, having said that, I'm as good as dead, so... it's been nice knowing all of you!
I already said you could investigate me, and if necessary, lynch me. But I am saying it will be a waste of your time.
At some point, the lawman may end up deciding to kill me so that he can keep the other primary suspects alive. That's a shame, too. But, even as a neutral, I am willing to die for town.
#Winstontoostrong
#Montytoostronger
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
Knowing you has convinced me that you would not use such tactics for victory.
APTG's neutrality declaration is a big blow to town, Tiberus is WOG bait, without APTG and Tiberus its only gonna be just me, Andres and YLC, which means this could be the last voting round.
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
I already voted solid, so if I had any reason to change my mind and save my life, that window of opportunity has passed.
I have a theory as to who it is as well.
#Winstontoostrong
#Montytoostronger
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
You can of course tell us that theory if you wish.
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
I've never said you cannot change your vote if it is SOLID, only that you should vote that way if you're sure it won't change later.
It's a flag for me, not a carving in stone for you.
EDIT:
I do see I used the term "concrete" in there. This was meant as the adjective form, not the noun. Sorry.In addition, if when placing your vote, you know for sure it will not change, you can add the term SOLID. In the event everyone is content with their choices, this will let me know that I can end the day early. If you have already voted for someone, but would like to make it concrete: post previous vote:SOLID
I.e. a concrete vote, as in real and tangible, as opposed to an abstract idea of how you're leaning.
Last edited by Yoyoma1910; 01-20-2009 at 17:33.
My kingdom for a
.
Re: You Can't Win-Small Game (IN PLAY)
Very well. I choose to change my vote.
Unvote: Abstain
Vote: YLC
His reasoning given is that he's a vigilante. That's fine... but he's a confirmed killer.
QJC: Please look back at my posts. i revealed a long time ago I was neutral. From this error, I have to assume you aren't paying attention... which tells me you aren't that concerned about your life. It has to be YLC at this point. Obviously if the mafioso dies, I survive the game. So I have reasons for not being so neutral now.
Last edited by Askthepizzaguy; 01-20-2009 at 17:47.
#Winstontoostrong
#Montytoostronger
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks