Cross posted from another forum, I'm a little surprised CR didn't get to this first.
http://fe11.story.media.ac4.yahoo.co...cotus_evidence
Excerpt:
Looking on the bright side, they aren't quartering troops in our homes yet.WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court said Wednesday that evidence obtained after illegal searches or arrests based on simple police mistakes may be used to prosecute criminal defendants.
The justices split 5-4 along ideological lines to apply new limits to the court's so-called exclusionary rule, which generally requires evidence to be suppressed if it results from a violation of a suspect's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches or seizure.
Bookmarks