Brown is a totalbut crisis would have happened regardless, sit back and enjoy, may you live in interesting times
Brown is a totalbut crisis would have happened regardless, sit back and enjoy, may you live in interesting times
Last edited by Fragony; 01-22-2009 at 16:42.
Can't say I didn't see that coming.
#Hillary4prism
BD:TW
Some piously affirm: "The truth is such and such. I know! I see!"
And hold that everything depends upon having the “right” religion.
But when one really knows, one has no need of religion. - Mahavyuha Sutra
Freedom necessarily involves risk. - Alan Watts
Education: that which reveals to the wise,
and conceals from the stupid,
the vast limits of their knowledge.
Mark Twain
Brown can't solely be blamed for the economic problem. if your going to blame one person for it blame former president Bush. Leader of the worlds biggest economy and then bang recession hits after years of poor management with money. Just another thing he did wrong. Just remember pretty much half the Western worlds economy depends on the USA. As soon as their bubble went bust so did everybody else's.
And whilst Brown is no hero I would prefer him over the Eaton graduate's club any day. To be honest if any one is even considering voting for that upper class snob Cameron you should be ashamed of yourself. Like he has the peoples best interest at heart and not the banks.
Yer right..
Why? Clinton actually, banks actually do not like lending money to people who can't pay it back.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act
Last edited by Fragony; 01-22-2009 at 14:31.
Bushy hardly did a great job of regulating it though did he? He was the one who also stood by and did nothing whilst the sub prime housing market went to the wall.
To be honest if we actually tried to regulate our markets and make sure the banks weren't so careless with who they lend money to we could of probably avoided this. Of course this is hard to do when you have some loonies who think regulation is socialism..
Last edited by tibilicus; 01-22-2009 at 14:41.
I love it! European version of Bush Derangement Syndrome.![]()
Reinvent the British and you get a global finance center, edible food and better service. Reinvent the French and you may just get more Germans.
Ik hou van ferme grieten en dikke pintenOriginally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars
Down with dried flowers!
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
It isn't that easy to just make a law just go away, blaming Bush for this is more then a little bit off.
you read this?
The Equal Credit Opportunity Act, enacted in 1974, makes it unlawful for any creditor to discriminate against any applicant, with respect to any aspect of a credit transaction, on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, or age. Failure to comply can subject a financial institution to civil liability for actual and punitive damages
Last edited by Fragony; 01-22-2009 at 15:29.
I don't think it was specifically Bush's fault. I think the blame has to be put at people like Greenspan really. He presided and proclaimed the mantra of deregulation. Bush, like Brown et al, were just followers.
"The republicans will draft your kids, poison the air and water, take away your social security and burn down black churches if elected." Gawain of Orkney
I'm not trying to say that please read my other post. https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...8&postcount=18
All im trying to say is Bush did nothing along with a lot of other governments to even try and regulate the economy. I'm pretty sure that Australia has a much more vigorously regulated economy where banks,hedge funds and the like are regulated and poor credit transactions and toxic loans are a less common occurrence. I'm stating however that Bush, being leader of the single biggest economy in which every economy in the world almost is tied into did not do a good job of managing the economy. It's not just me that's saying that it's a lot of economic analysts.
The reason why I point at bush is because it was his responsibility to regulate and bring stability the the US and world economic system. Fair enough he didn't cause half the problems involved in it but from where I'm standing he did bugger all to try and soften the blow.
Last edited by tibilicus; 01-22-2009 at 16:32.
you might try clinton, it was his gov't that persuaded Fannie and Freddie to provide social lending.
i think you will find that a free marketeer is the polar opposite to a corprotist (sp?), and browns nationalising of the banks give him a great claim to the latter title.
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
Bookmarks