ideas for an AAR

[Roka]

Voted for Casse.

You can always play ahead to the future and only then write about what happened. Let's say you can put all of the infrastructure building in one chapter even if it took you 20 years to get there.

yeah that's what i was considering doing, i just mean that it's rather boring and tedious for me to play up until the point were I am ready for aggressive expansionist behaviour

[SwissBarbar]

its the ptolies for me, for the same reason you wrote

[Roka]

its the ptolies for me, for the same reason you wrote

i've actually managed to persuade myself that a casse campagin would be a pain in the neck, and now thinking more along the lines of the ptolies, as i like the phalanx combat.

however whatever the majority decision is on here i will go for

unless it's decided that i should go makedonia, as i'm a good bit through my makedonian campaign and i don't want to start again to be perfectly honest

[julius_caesar_the_first]

I voted Casse but I think that you should play a faction you like. If you don't like what you are doing then it's likely you will abandon the AAR.

[Roka]

I voted Casse but I think that you should play a faction you like. If you don't like what you are doing then it's likely you will abandon the AAR.

you have a point there, it's not that i don't enjoy playing the casse, i do, it's just that it takes a while to get really started

[Theodotos I]

I'd say Casse and start about five to ten years into the campaign. I enjoy "barbarian" AARs--they suit my writing style. Good luck, and I'll be following as time permits.

[Roka]

I'd say Casse and start about five to ten years into the campaign. I enjoy "barbarian" AARs--they suit my writing style. Good luck, and I'll be following as time permits.

thanks for responding, i have actually ran into an obstacle as my R:TW disk is now cracked and i'll need to wait until payday to get a new one