The Godfather, Part 3 [Concluded]

[Askthepizzaguy]

Because people whine when I post long analysis/accusations:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...&postcount=262


Post 262-
You restate things we already know, and quote long sections of the writeup.
You point out the obvious, esp the spelling/grammar errors. You're quite wishy-washy as to whether we should read much into this or not.

You speculate on the second death in such a way that it almost sounds like you have a planned argument to make, to make it sound like you're a contributing townie.

"As of this moment I have no real suspects, but to not vote is to avoid the issue."
After all that analysis, you have nothing, and you vote for someone with no reasoning behind it.

https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...&postcount=334

Post 334-

You excuse yourself.


https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...&postcount=370

Post 370-

Now it gets interesting. You are once again analyzing the writeup, and make a very interesting "discovery" that someone had basically ripped off a previous kill of yours from a previous game, if that is your allegation.

"Basically a placeholder vote. I'm completely stumped at the moment, but it would appeal to his sense of irony to kill 'Khann the same round as stealing my kill description."

Once again, long analysis followed by a vote with no real reasoning behind it.

https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...&postcount=443


Voting by gut instinct and very minimal reasoning.

Bottom line: Gaius scribonius curio, I find your playing style in this game to be an act without substance. Please explain yourself. Why all these hollow analyses that lead nowhere, and votes for no good reasoning? Why were you in the lead against Sasaki?