The Godfather, Part 3 [Concluded]

**Beefy187** · 02-11-2009, 13:22

Originally Posted by Rythmic

Yes, your right. I got you mixed up with taka somehow.

Unvote Vote: taka

Well in that case, sorry for the ! s.. I realised that came out bit more agressive then I intended it to be.

**TinCow** · 02-11-2009, 13:30

YLC, you put forth interesting mafia philosophy, but it doesn't help the town in any way in the actual game. You are now intentionally and knowingly making things difficult for the town. If you're truly townie, then you're not helping. You're a legit lynch for this reason. You've got no one but yourself to blame for a wasted lynch.

**Seamus Fermanagh** · 02-11-2009, 14:55

YLC:

Voting for yourself is a very WIFOM strategy. I have done it, but only after arguing my innocence for numerous posts as an innocent townie about to be lynched. I was trying, desparately to signal that I was town. I got lynched. "I don't think you should lynch so-and-so, so kill me instead" is a really poor tactic.

The whole point of putting votes on Sigurd was to get him to respond and at length....FOR HIMSELF.

Your parsiflage has re-centered the ENTIRE discussion around you. However, it has not centered on your innocence, guilt or anything else, but on your condescending re-statements about us "not getting it" and the town frustration. WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED?

Sigurd:

Not quite sanguine about you yet, but I acknowledge that my only evidence against you -- so far -- has been brevity of posts and a post frequency that matches one of your previous "lurker mafia tactics" games. The real goal for me was to get you engaged and build evidence on you one way or the other. That process has begun, so...

Unvote: Sigurd

However, my post evaluations did not spotlight only Sigurd's behavior. Rythmic, in only 10 posts, has managed to record 6 votes. In fact, he had 5 votes in the first 6 posts. So, why such assiduous attention to not getting wogged without really putting a lot into the discussion?

Vote: Rythmic

Others of interest are Taka for his similar vote but not discuss much approach, and Grizzly/Jolt for the ongoing vote fued. That feud is classic mafia to set up a "but I voted against her/him twice!" defense. No such votes were put out when any REAL pressure might have been exerted.

THoughts?

**naut** · 02-11-2009, 14:57

One word Seamus, hangover.

Also, you may want to bold your vote.

**LittleGrizzly** · 02-11-2009, 15:24

and Grizzly/Jolt for the ongoing vote fued. That feud is classic mafia to set up a "but I voted against her/him twice!" defense. No such votes were put out when any REAL pressure might have been exerted.

I made both those votes when there were a fair few people left to vote, i also though i had decent reasoning behind it and explained my reasoning, i may be tempted to put a vote on a fellow mafia but i wouldn't have the guts to start the voting and questioning of my fellow scum... i think the main thing that really blows this idea out the water is Jolt's reaction, he made himself look kinda scummy with his impassioned defence, if it was a premade play between the two of us i would imagine he would have had a less scummy response...

I have basically sent a fellow mafia to the gallows once in midgaard saga II but at that point alot of suspicion was on sarathos anyway... i will explain in a little more deatil if anyone wants...

Rythmic... thats a hell of a long hagover...

**naut** · 02-11-2009, 15:29

Originally Posted by LittleGrizzly

Rythmic... thats a hell of a long hagover...

Three separate hangovers to be precise.

But yes, your correct I was simply voting to avoid a WoG. Because I'd at least be a little useful later on, or at least I hope I am.

**Jolt** · 02-11-2009, 16:49

Originally Posted by LittleGrizzly

and Grizzly/Jolt for the ongoing vote fued. That feud is classic mafia to set up a "but I voted against her/him twice!" defense. No such votes were put out when any REAL pressure might have been exerted.

I made both those votes when there were a fair few people left to vote, i also though i had decent reasoning behind it and explained my reasoning, i may be tempted to put a vote on a fellow mafia but i wouldn't have the guts to start the voting and questioning of my fellow scum... i think the main thing that really blows this idea out the water is Jolt's reaction, he made himself look kinda scummy with his impassioned defence, if it was a premade play between the two of us i would imagine he would have had a less scummy response...

I have basically sent a fellow mafia to the gallows once in midgaard saga II but at that point alot of suspicion was on sarathos anyway... i will explain in a little more deatil if anyone wants...

Rythmic... thats a hell of a long hagover...

Decent? Pah-leeze. Basing your vote on my already proven non-activity on weekend is hardly any evidence at all. As ATPG well said, I have nothing whatsoever that sheds any suspicion on me (Besides my reaction to stupid motives for lynching me), reading what TinCow well said, the plagarization of the kills from past games is probably the works of someone who has played those games (I don't have the mood or the time to go read past Mafia games, and apparently you have played the games in question, which adds even more heat on your side), and your words "to provide an alternative", (especially with the baseless reasons to have given for my lynch) for the lynch vote makes me suspect that you are indeed one of the henchmen of the Godfather. I'd wish if there is an investigator role, that he investigate LG.

Vote: LittleGrizzly

Although, it'd be damn funny if me and Grizzly were mafia. xD