Results 1 to 30 of 31

Thread: Anachronisms ?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    is not a senior Member Meneldil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re : Anachronisms ?

    1799 as the end date is just stupid.

    MTW, RTW and M2TW had significant starting/era/ending dates. What the heck is this 1700-1799 period ?

  2. #2
    Dux Nova Scotia Member lars573's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Halifax NewScotland Canada
    Posts
    4,114

    Default Re: Anachronisms ?

    The 18th century, that's what. The age of elighenment. Of course we have no idea on what the turn:date ratio is like.
    If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.

    VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI

    I came, I saw, I kicked ass

  3. #3
    Member Megas Methuselah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Prairie Grasslands
    Posts
    5,040

    Default Re: Anachronisms ?

    Despite that, I do wish they included the Napoleonic era. I guess it'll just be an expansion of sorts...

  4. #4
    Bopa Member Incongruous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    H.M.S Default
    Posts
    2,647

    Default Re: Anachronisms ?

    Dragoons continued to use their firearms even after they were reformed into cavalry proper.

    Pikeman were used by poorly trained forces all the way into the French revolution, to some effect, it will be useful to have when your luck is down.

    Sig by Durango

    Now that the House of Commons is trying to become useful, it does a great deal of harm.
    -Oscar Wilde

  5. #5
    Member Member Polemists's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In the Lou
    Posts
    1,213

    Default Re: Anachronisms ?

    The 18th century, that's what. The age of elighenment. Of course we have no idea on what the turn:date ratio is like.
    Hate to break facts to you but it was mentioned in another thread that CA is doing the two turns=one year model again.

    You can probably mod it out later of course, and customizing events happening through adjusting a file number, but the out of box game is going to be two turns a year.

    So you have 198 turns to play ETW grand campaign, I could be wrong of course if they change the dates or something but the 1700-1799 seems pretty solid.

    It's not a period like MTW or Rome's four hundred year span. So it may seem short to many, but it's just way it is.

  6. #6
    Dux Nova Scotia Member lars573's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Halifax NewScotland Canada
    Posts
    4,114

    Default Re: Anachronisms ?

    With only 200 turns I might actually finish more than one campagin. For the second time ever.
    Last edited by lars573; 02-02-2009 at 06:21.
    If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.

    VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI

    I came, I saw, I kicked ass

  7. #7
    Member Member Polemists's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In the Lou
    Posts
    1,213

    Default Re: Anachronisms ?

    exactly, while CA is going for a more fast paced, quicker momentum game, hopefully with new ai, new battle system, and new graphics there will be tons of replayablitiy (and I think there will). Even playing the same faction again is now different because of individual faction tech trees. Plus with emergent factions, colonies, and like, you new know who you might end up facing.

    For those turtles in the crowd who enjoyed the 50 years build up, it pulls some of that away, though hopefully with quicker armies and buildings a couple years will be more then enough time to build up before you begin.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO