Wow. Great ideas. Thanks for all of this so far.
As far as ramming goes, it would be accurate for mediterranean galleys to use ramming to a limited extant, the main issue being that galleys were replaced by purely sail-powered ships by around 1700, meaning that CA may decide not to bother including the ramming function within ETW. However, if they do, it would definitely allow for realistic galley combat, which is a must for an ETW based EB.
The focus on ranged combat could go either way, depending on how it is implemented. Archers, and skirmishers might possibly react more realistically when engaging in pre-battle skirmish. This would be especially helpfull in portraying the ranged combat of Persia and the East. However, it is also possible that focus would only inhibit melee troops from acting normally, which would be very unfortunate. We will have to wait and see.
50 factions, "unlimited" provinces .... does anyone have an estimate of the unit limit? This is very important. I have indeed read comments by EB team members that stated to the effect that a higher unit limit is more important than more factions or even provinces, in a similar way the unlimited model number of M2TW is more important than all of these other factors for EBII.
Makes me hopeful for the future of EB. Keep brainstorming more ideas Orgahs.
Chairman
Bookmarks