Should we restrict freedom of speech?

[Evil_Maniac From Mars]

No regulations on freedom of speech - however, there is nothing wrong with, for example, a libel lawsuit.

[CrossLOPER]

No regulations on freedom of speech - however, there is nothing wrong with, for example, a libel lawsuit.

That's similar to what I'm thinking.

[Furunculus]

Freedom of speech needs mild regulation against incitement of violence against groups

[Seamus Fermanagh]

I put number two, but I do believe that the "clear and present danger" standard must apply.

[Furunculus]

what is the clear and present danger business?

[Seamus Fermanagh]

Incitement to violence is not enough. Such incitement must be occurring at a time when there exists a realistic likelihood of inciting that violence.

Yelling "FIRE!" while standing on a soapbox at an intersection is not a realistic incitement to panic.

Calling President Bush a murdering warmonger is not incitement, unless you then encourage an attack on him while he is present or an attack on other's and their property as a means of vengeance.

In other words, there must exist a "Clear and Present Danger" in the effort to incite. Hot air should not be restricted.

[Lemur]

Excellent point, Seamus, and 100% agreement on this end.

[Furunculus]

Incitement to violence is not enough. Such incitement must be occurring at a time when there exists a realistic likelihood of inciting that violence.

Yelling "FIRE!" while standing on a soapbox at an intersection is not a realistic incitement to panic.

Calling President Bush a murdering warmonger is not incitement, unless you then encourage an attack on him while he is present or an attack on other's and their property as a means of vengeance.

In other words, there must exist a "Clear and Present Danger" in the effort to incite. Hot air should not be restricted.

very much agreed, thank you.

[CountArach]

Why should someone choose what random series of grunts and noises comes from my mouth?