Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

  1. #1

    Default europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    now im a huge eb fan nd thinks its the most realistic mod out there but would any one agree that its economy is a bit lame although much better then vanilla or other mods.. i mean realisticly a single city like syracuse or athens would have been able to support large field armies nd navies without going into the negatives... also cities with major ports would have been able to transport goods to regions really far away like india... im sure its a distance problem but that would be cool if you could decide what cities to trade with. Also i think the farming income is a bit light in most regions... tell me what u guys think

  2. #2
    Haruhiist Member Zett's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Republik Freies Wendland
    Posts
    244

    Default AW: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    That are all (except the farming income) hard coded issues. So there is nearly nothing that the EB team could do about them. Perhaps you could give +50 trade fleets to the big trading cities (if it is possible) and then one of the trade routs could make it to India.

    Ceterum censeo Romam esse delendam


    Balloon Count: 4

    My Greek Nobles:
    from satalexton, his name is Plato
    from satalexton, his name is Sōkrátēs
    from satalexton, his nam is Aristotélēs

  3. #3
    Symbasileus ton Rhomaioktonon Member Maion Maroneios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Heraklion, Crete, Greece
    Posts
    2,610

    Default Re: AW: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    Not to say that no city could field huge armies on it's own. Ever. They used funds from allies/suboordinates to do so. For example, Athens, even though she was a quite prosperous city during the Persian Wars, could field about 10,000 male citizen hoplites plus several thousand light troops at most, and that with help of surrounding cities and villages, as well as an extensive farming system stretching around the region of Attica.

    Maion
    ~Maion

  4. #4
    Member Member seienchin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    588
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    Every City in Rome stands for a region, so its quite hard to understand why Sparta or Athens can only field big armies alone, when controlled by the Computer

  5. #5
    EB on ALX player Member ziegenpeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    COLONIA CLAVDIA ARA AGRIPPINENSIVM
    Posts
    741

    Default Re: AW: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    Quote Originally Posted by Maion Maroneios View Post
    Not to say that no city could field huge armies on it's own. Ever. They used funds from allies/suboordinates to do so. For example, Athens, even though she was a quite prosperous city during the Persian Wars, could field about 10,000 male citizen hoplites plus several thousand light troops at most, and that with help of surrounding cities and villages, as well as an extensive farming system stretching around the region of Attica.

    Maion
    ...as - due to the region and the RTWs engines limits - depicted by the City of Athens. So waydog is right, I guess.

    "A wise man once said: Never buy a game full price!"
    - Another wise man

  6. #6

    Default Re: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    [Disclaimer: Nothing I say here is meant to be offensive to the EB team.]

    Two things I don't quite like about EB are:

    1. Every faction starts out with just about the same amount of money. Sure, some start out with 3,000, but most others start out at 5,000. I don't see how this is realistic. Shouldn't historically rich factions start out with just a tad more?

    2. The barracks in EB are similar to those in Vanilla RTW. What I mean is that you start out with barracks that can produce mostly levies, then you gradually have to build them up to the point where you can field elites. To use the Arche Seleukia and Ptolemaoi as an example, shouldn't they be able to recruit Hetairoi and Hypaspistai by 272 B.C.E.?

  7. #7
    ETW Steam: Little Fox Member mini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    899

    Default Re: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    1) too damn addictive

    2) too slow to make: give EB on mtw2 engine NOW plz :D

    in addition to point 2: and give EB on ETW engine next month, aight!

  8. #8
    EB on ALX player Member ziegenpeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    COLONIA CLAVDIA ARA AGRIPPINENSIVM
    Posts
    741

    Default Re: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    @MButcher: I don't know if mini wanted to say the same about 2. but I didn't like it either and I was told that if you enable Elite units from the beginning the AI would spam them.

    "A wise man once said: Never buy a game full price!"
    - Another wise man

  9. #9
    ETW Steam: Little Fox Member mini's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    899

    Default Re: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    my 2 points had nothing to do with what Mbutcher posted :)

  10. #10

    Default Re: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    Quote Originally Posted by ziegenpeter View Post
    @MButcher: I don't know if mini wanted to say the same about 2. but I didn't like it either and I was told that if you enable Elite units from the beginning the AI would spam them.

    I thought about that too and I think the easiest way to fix the spamming of elites is by increasing the number of turns it takes to recruit them by one. I tried this on the Romani to stop them from spamming Triarii and Pedites, and strangely it worked. They field balanced armies because of it.

  11. #11
    Barcid Member soup_alex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    168

    Default Re: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    A couple of things limit my own enjoyment of this, otherwise excellent, game.

    1) AI stupidity! Though obviously not a fault of EB or the EB team.

    2) While I can live with every faction starting with an arbitrary amount of money, as I imagine it would be very difficult to establish exactly how much wealth a particular kingdom or empire had at its disposal at a particular time in history. What irritates me is how every faction's economy is set to plummet at game start unless the player does something sharpish to arrest its decline (typically by warring with the far more powerful independent neighbours, or else just disbanding armies). I like that this encourages strategy and controls the rate at which all factions can expand, but being put in a situation where your empire's coffers can't support its armies seems unbalanced and perhaps ahistorical.
    "The pathfinding around town squares is twenty different kinds of horrible."Watchman

  12. #12
    EBII Bricklayer Member V.T. Marvin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Directing the defence of Boiotergion
    Posts
    3,361

    Default Re: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    Quote Originally Posted by soup_alex View Post
    What irritates me is how every faction's economy is set to plummet at game start unless the player does something sharpish to arrest its decline (typically by warring with the far more powerful independent neighbours, or else just disbanding armies). I like that this encourages strategy and controls the rate at which all factions can expand, but being put in a situation where your empire's coffers can't support its armies seems unbalanced and perhaps ahistorical.
    Hmm, I would say the contrary - you have an army for a purpose - to wage war.
    Now, if you want war and expand - you have an army for that from the start.
    Or you want to stay in peace and look after your bussiness - well you just disband the troops.

    Note that at those time almost none of the states depicted in EB did have a large standing army. Rather the overwhelming majority of troops were levied/hired for a specific campaign only to return back to their fields once it ended.

  13. #13
    EB TRIBVNVS PLEBIS Member MarcusAureliusAntoninus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The State of Jefferson, USA
    Posts
    5,722

    Default Re: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    Farming income in a region is tied to population growth. To keep exploding populations down, the farming income took a big hit in EB.

    Trade fleets are actually hardcoded to the port level. No matter what the description says, each port level gains 1 trade fleet, up to 3.


  14. #14

    Default Re: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    EB Economy is actually what makes it so challenging. There are many modifications where you are already swimming in cash by day one, and that might also be true for the Romani. I just hope they start with less generous pecuniary possibilities for the next release since this is bringing the polish of this faction a bit down, in my opinion.

    Furthermore it is my firm belief that the Hellenistic Suine must be razed from the ground and their survivors boiled alive to free us from their putrid stain on the earth once and for all.

  15. #15

    Default Re: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    Hmm, the only gripe I have about EB's economics is how little an effect trade caravans have compared to the cost and time it takes to build them. This is mostly because Saba and the steppe factions don't have very good trade in their starting areas.

    Rather than messing with trade, I'm considering modding in happiness bonuses to the mid and higher level caravan routes, since the Sauromatae lack good public order buildings anyway.

    The other gripes I have are usually about hardcoded things. The AI thinks phalanxes are invinclble (and often are in auto-calc), no diplomacy, etc.
    ...at least put some spikes in your club for goodness sake!

  16. #16
    Guest desert's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    The greatest polis built by men.
    Posts
    1,120

    Default Re: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    The thing about armies is that often you would use them for only a turn or two, and then disband them. That's why they wouldn't be too expensive usually. A good way to simulate this is to give units 0-turn recruitment times, but that unfortunately messes up the AI.

    In the Peloponnesian War, Athens could support several thousand hoplites, 10-20K peltasts and psiloi, and 300 triremes with their starfleet-size crews, even though it had suffered the loss of up to 1/3 of its (Attica's) population during the plague. Although it was mostly because they got mad money from Type IV governments and Protectorates.
    Last edited by desert; 02-28-2009 at 01:24.

  17. #17
    Member Member seienchin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    588
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: europa barbarorum's economy/ or anything u dont like about eb

    Im thinking about an Economy Mini Mod, but I dont know if I have the free time for it
    I would increase the Tax Money and trade in Home provinces and increase the corruption in all the other provinces.
    Arche Seleukia would get a Tax minus around 70% in all of their Level 2-4 Provinces and instead get Money from the temples they build to resemble their Tax system, which was entirely based on temple taxes.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO