Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Controversial Suggestion for a Mini-Mod

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member zooeyglass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    245

    Default Re: Controversial Suggestion for a Mini-Mod

    i think that's a rather interesting suggestion. i'm impressed you laid out various conditions, etc, and it seems like a nearly workable situation....however, i know next to nothing of modding, and wait upon more experienced opinions to suggest if it's possible, or playable at all. certainly i'd agree that if there were some way of indicating that the gap between sicily and carthage was more important than carthage towards pretty much any other port...that would be good!
    inde consilivm mihi pavca de Avgvsto et extrema tradere, mox Tiberii principatum et cetera, sine ira et stvdio, qvorvm cavsas procvl habeo.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Controversial Suggestion for a Mini-Mod

    Quote Originally Posted by zooeyglass View Post
    i think that's a rather interesting suggestion. i'm impressed you laid out various conditions, etc, and it seems like a nearly workable situation....however, i know next to nothing of modding, and wait upon more experienced opinions to suggest if it's possible, or playable at all. certainly i'd agree that if there were some way of indicating that the gap between sicily and carthage was more important than carthage towards pretty much any other port...that would be good!
    I'm actually kinda scared of myself, seeing how bloody long that post got But I thought the actual idea sounded so far out ('walking on water from africa to sicily'), that I had to get some arguments up there, so people would know why I'm suggesting this
    Moreover, I advise that Syracusans must be added to EB (insp. by Cato the Elder )

    Is looking forward to the 2090's, when EB 20.0 will be released - spanning the entire Eurasian continent and having no Eleutheroi - with a faction for every independent state instead. Look out for the Gedrosians, the Cretans and the kingdom of Kallatis!

  3. #3
    Member Member zooeyglass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    245

    Default Re: Controversial Suggestion for a Mini-Mod

    Quote Originally Posted by artaxerxes View Post
    I'm actually kinda scared of myself, seeing how bloody long that post got But I thought the actual idea sounded so far out ('walking on water from africa to sicily'), that I had to get some arguments up there, so people would know why I'm suggesting this
    if anything i'd suggest that your thread title, esp with "controversial" in it, might put people off, and lead them to think it's another LS or flaming pigs kinda question, or some such....in fact, your suggestion was a good one, you explained yourself, and it's just up to people who know how to mod to explain whether it's possible, within the mechanics of the game....what's controversial about that?

    ....oh wait, you want to build a bridge from africa to sicily? are you INSANE??....hehe
    inde consilivm mihi pavca de Avgvsto et extrema tradere, mox Tiberii principatum et cetera, sine ira et stvdio, qvorvm cavsas procvl habeo.

  4. #4
    Member Member anubis88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    3,400

    Default Re: Controversial Suggestion for a Mini-Mod

    Well i agree with your basic concept, i just don't believe that this would be possible... I mean it might be possible, but there could be many side effects
    Europa Barbarorum Secretary

  5. #5
    Member Member zooeyglass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    245

    Default Re: Controversial Suggestion for a Mini-Mod

    Quote Originally Posted by anubis88 View Post
    Well i agree with your basic concept, i just don't believe that this would be possible... I mean it might be possible, but there could be many side effects
    ...like elephants rampaging in italia....
    inde consilivm mihi pavca de Avgvsto et extrema tradere, mox Tiberii principatum et cetera, sine ira et stvdio, qvorvm cavsas procvl habeo.

  6. #6
    Barcid Member soup_alex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Yonder
    Posts
    168

    Default Re: Controversial Suggestion for a Mini-Mod

    Anything that could be done to advance the competetiveness and strategic flexibility of the AI (without too much bias) sounds delicious to me.

    Oh, and artaxerxes—the AI doesn't need to consider steps 1-2 in a 1st Punic War scenario if Rome has already been pushed back halfway up Italy
    "The pathfinding around town squares is twenty different kinds of horrible."Watchman

  7. #7
    Terrible Tactician Member Shadowwalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Germania Libera *g*
    Posts
    299

    Default Re: Controversial Suggestion for a Mini-Mod

    @artaxerxes:

    Interesting post.
    I would suggest you try out Ferromancers "EB for BI" mod, as it (beside a lot of other things) highly improves the chance of naval invasions.
    I install it since EB 1.1 (or even 1.0 ... not sure about that...) and played some campaigns as Romans and Qart'Hadast.
    I can tell that at least Sicily, Sardinia and Corsica are not safe areas anymore.
    And in most of my campaigns the AI also managed to invade Italy or North Africa with rather nice armies.

    I highly recommend that you try it out.
    Finished EB Campaigns: Kart-Hadast 1.0/1.2 | Pontos 1.1 | Arche Seleukeia 1.2 | Hayasdan 1.2 | Sab'yn 1.2 | Makedonia 1.2 (Alex)
    Lost Campaigns (1.2, Alex. exe): Getai | Sab'Yn
    Ongoing campaigns (1.2): SPQR (110 BC) | Sab'yn (217 BC) | Pontos (215 BC)
    from Populus Romanus

    "The state of human ethics can be summarized in two sentences: We ought to. But we don't." (Tucholsky)

  8. #8
    Satalextos Basileus Seron Member satalexton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,180

    Default Re: Controversial Suggestion for a Mini-Mod

    funny, i'm using Alex.exe and during my last 2 campaigns (as Pontos then now as Baktra) the Carthies are happily shipping stack after stack of elite pikemen and african infantry to eat some romans. Especially on my current one, the Aedui are giving them Romaioi a hard time, the Epirote's pushing up Italy from the east, Carthage landed 3 stacks to work their way up Rhegion...what surprised me the most is that the Makedonian AI (oh joy) are actually sending stacks into Italy through Illyria AND the ships the built from Ambrakia....it seems I won't be getting the Cat-tank bodyguard anytime soon xD




    "ΜΗΔΕΝ ΕΩΡΑΚΕΝΑΙ ΦΟΒΕΡΩΤΕΡΟΝ ΚΑΙ ΔΕΙΝΟΤΕΡΟΝ ΦΑΛΑΓΓΟΣ ΜΑΚΕΔΟΝΙΚΗΣ" -Lucius Aemilius Paullus

  9. #9

    Default Re: Controversial Suggestion for a Mini-Mod

    Try playing with BI (link in my sig) or the Alex engine. Much more challenging with naval invasions.
    Currently playing as:

    Want to play Europa Barbarorum on Barbarian Invasion? Read all about it!
    Thanks for the balloons!

    Big Brother got you down? Join the Freedom Group on the .org!

  10. #10
    Member Member Mjolnir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    232

    Default Re: Controversial Suggestion for a Mini-Mod

    For those of us playing with RTW.exe this mini-mod would definitely liven things up. If someone makes this I would definitely use it.



    My AAR: Basileion Bosphorou: a Tale of the Pontos Euxeinos

    Tribvnvs Caivs Aemilivs Mamercvs - BtSH

    Strategos Bithys Nisaias Parthiakes - WotB

    From Antinous:

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO