Indefinite Bannings

[TinCow]

Criticism is not a violation of privacy.

Correct, using software to view private photobucket accounts is a violation of privacy.

There is no way of knowing whether that was a violation of privacy.

You seem to be mistaking the Org for a court of law. His statements clearly demonstrated that he had used software to view private photobucket accounts for at least one member of the Org, likely more, as well as numerous classmates of his who are not on the Org. That is sufficient evidence for us, even if it's not good enough for a criminal conviction.

So knowledge about the inherenet safety flaws of Photobucket and other image hosting sities is enough to get you banned? Wow, just wow.

AP confessed to using that knowledge on multiple people who didn't have accounts on the Org, as well as at least one who did. He also made statements indicating that he was looking at the private sections of other Org members who had posted pictures on the forums. Try and get your facts straight if you want to defend him, because you're just making yourself look ridiculous.