Indefinite Bannings

[Subotan]

"Some of the Orgahs they easily fusker the other photos of you " - This is code for "I can get other pictures of you" enforced with a tongue, which also hints that he most likely have as well.

No it doesn't. AP is a very literal person, and he meant exactly what he said. He was referring to certain other members of the .Org.

People are punished when they violate Org rules. Viewing private Photobucket accounts is a violation of Org Rules:

Would my privacy be violated if any of you visited my private Photobucket without my knowledge iif I retrospectively gave my consent? No, it wouldn't, because the whole point of privacy is that consent is not given. Of course, if I didn't then give my consent, then that would be a violation of privacy, and AP should not have done what he did, as he didn't have prior permission. But if Secura gave her consent afterwards (I don't know if this occurred, as I haven not seen a direct statement from her, but from the VM conversation seen it would not be unreasonable to assume so temporarily), then it is not possible to use "violation of privacy" as justification for this disproportionate punishment.

@ Beskar: your phrasing makes it all the more disturbing: ‘This is code for "I can get other pictures of you" enforced with a tongue’

That's gross slander. Even if we ignore the fact that AP is asexual, it still doesn't mean that at all. As I explained above, he was referring to other members, and his tongue emoticon is one that he commonly uses. He even made a thread about himself a few weeks ago complaining about his own overuse of that particular emoticon.

To be clear, AP was not punished for off-site actions. However, his statements about what he was doing with non-member accounts were factored in when determining whether he had done the same thing to Org member accounts. As he had already said he had viewed at least one Org account (a Moderator's account),

his statements about doing it to off-site accounts were sufficient to convince us that he had indeed done it to multiple Org member accounts, especially when combined with other posts he made indicating that he was attempting or planning to do it to other Org member accounts.

So, AP has had a pre-emptive ban tio prevent him from doing actions which you're not even sure he was going to do? I thought that was the whole point of warnings.