Homos? As in the Latin word "human"?
Homos? As in the Latin word "human"?
If you want to give him the benefit of the doubt, fine. But that was seriously uncalled for.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
- Proud Horseman of the Presence
Sigh, the internet's weakness shows up again. Sorry 'bout that.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
- Proud Horseman of the Presence
I don't use it. I wouldn't be using it even if I had kids. Anyway, there's nothing modest about a bunch of doped up, sword wielding Gauls charging at you, loincloth or no loincloth.
A big THANKS to all Total War modders
Heed the wisdom in Omanes Alexandropolites' signature!
i don't use it, i don't get offended by a penis made of flesh, so why would i get offended by a penis made of pixels?
What would be the use of using the modesty patch? Who could get offended by that? Do little children take their bath clothed? I would feel offended by real naked Celts, yes... but their just on your display.
I used because i do not think they really where naked. It seems to me if i have to fight naked it is to much off a disadvantage. Even so ,if they did do it ,after the first time with a lot off causality's they also will never try-ed it again.
This is only my idea not historically backed up.
![]()
Things as they say can only go better, sometimes...
I don't think they had anymore disadvantage than any other unarmored warrior... They had even an advantage over the common unarmored warrior. Real-live warrior brave enough to charge naked would be quite an unsettling sight. It would also be an insult to you. So you would be angrier and thus less prudent and scared at the same time.
Just wearing a loin cloth would not have given much more protection either... since you seem to suggest that...
Bookmarks