And
White_Eyes is innocent. His earlier mistake which exposed me, and he claimed he didn't even know what a mason was, tells me he wasn't thinking or calculating his moves. No mafia would be that brazen to expose a mason who begs and pleads not to be exposed. No mafia would do insane challenges that early in the game.
LittleGrizzly, I highly disagree with your assessment. But then again, I see things from the perspective of a mason who got exposed by the guy. I cannot see a mafia doing that. But if you don't see what I saw first-hand, maybe you think we are both suspect.
I won't defend White_Eyes, but I will suggest he's probably not mafia. Just like Sasaki being innocent for that little cult ruse he played earlier which exposed me as having a "forked tongue" (the same thing I accused him of, by the way
) I just don't see the mafia doing such provocative behavior which is liable to get them investigated, lynched, or duelled to the death.
It's not proof but I think it's more compelling. And Yoyoma is "exposed" somewhat by Psychonaut's role reveal. I mean, who risks the game on a bluffing role reveal? A townie wouldn't screw over another townie like that, and his own team, who would then have to lynch him for such shenanigans, if he didn't have the role. And if he does have a role, he wouldn't blow his cover when he wasn't at least marginally sure of his results.
You don't have to bandwagon, nor do you have to believe what he just revealed; but I'd say a benefit of the doubt is in order, and as such, Yoyoma needs to be at least pressure voted a little. TinCow is also a candidate because Sasaki is a better analyzer than even me, and he pointed the finger at TinCow's objectively different behavior.
Re: The Settlement (IN PLAY)
Reply With Quote
. Just missed above 2 posts. What's this about drunkenness...?
Bookmarks