Solve this problem

[Askthepizzaguy]

What about a dual approach?

If you take the strategy of assuming everyone is possibly guilty, and then trying to find stuff that makes them appear innocent, then a clever mafioso will do whatever they can to appear innocent and be no longer considered a top suspect.

If however, you ALSO take the strategy of looking for telltale scummy behaviors, behaviors you can question and pressure someone about, then you could specifically target those who are acting out of sorts, even if they are making a big show of being a townie.

I am not blind to the lesson; indeed Sasaki's approach has at least as much merit as the opposing method. I do suggest that both approaches are not foolproof, and even better might be to do both. Read the thread from a "reduce the number of suspects" point of view, make your suspect list, and then read the thread from a behavioral/analytical standpoint looking specifically for scummy behavior to add a person to the list (starting at the standpoint of everyone is possibly guilty, but innocent until proven so)

Then, you could merge the two lists and go after certain people; using context of the thread and your experience to prioritize the suspects.

Any merit to this approach?

EDIT: Apparently I just reworded your argument, Sasaki... lol so of course you agree.