Org Mobile Site
Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy:
Vote Taka
Apparently this lurking caic is suspisious so I will give in to peer pressure.
Gaelic, that kind of voting is illegal.Vote Taka
Apparently this lurking caic is suspisious so I will give in to peer pressure.
You cannot change your vote by edit. You must repost.
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief:
What's so great about an Ares lynch? 
edit: I agree this was not the towns finest round. Lynching a lurker is hardly headbanging worthy though.
edit2:
Originally Posted by :
Gaelic, that kind of voting is illegal.
You cannot change your vote by edit. You must repost.
Where does it say that?Gaelic, that kind of voting is illegal.
You cannot change your vote by edit. You must repost.
Well, for starters, his lurking is uncommon for him, as opposed to taka's, which is the norm.
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief:
Well, for starters, his lurking is uncommon for him, as opposed to taka's, which is the norm.
It's a bit early say whether someone is lurking, so we lynch a known lurker...the kind of person who gets left alive all game and ends up in the final 4 with the game on the line.Well, for starters, his lurking is uncommon for him, as opposed to taka's, which is the norm.
Sort of the same reasoning I'd use for Seamus here. Hmm. Andres isn't barking either. Pressure voting doesn't work unless there is actual pressure involved. I'll question him next round.
unvote: Andres
vote: 777Ares777
Gives us options besides Taka and Reenk, if people change their minds.
tally:
Ares just signed in, so perhaps he will contribute more?
unvote: Andres
vote: 777Ares777
Gives us options besides Taka and Reenk, if people change their minds.
tally:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Ares just signed in, so perhaps he will contribute more?
Just in case it was missed
Unvote: YLC
Vote: Taka
Sorry for the wrong format earlier
Unvote: YLC
Vote: Taka
Sorry for the wrong format earlier
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro:
It's a bit early say whether someone is lurking, so we lynch a known lurker...the kind of person who gets left alive all game and ends up in the final 4 with the game on the line.
Ares's activity was a bit down when he was the Nudicyclist in GF3, and that was as a pro-town role. As a mafioso he'd probably be even more cautious. And he definitely would have posted by now.It's a bit early say whether someone is lurking, so we lynch a known lurker...the kind of person who gets left alive all game and ends up in the final 4 with the game on the line.
Okay. I still agree with taka as a choice. taka is NOT the only one, and it would be useful to pressure more -- including me. But you might also add Arach, Sigurd and a couple of the newer names. Also, Ituralde isn't exactly burning up the boards, and he certainly knows the drill.
Yes, ultimately, I am trying to change taka's style of play a bit, just as mine was altered in response to many lynches and more than a few murders.
It is basic that interaction provides evidence and lurking does not. We end up all the time in these games hammering any poor
who actually talks in the thread while letting people who slide in, vote, then leave get away with it. I wish to nix that. Anybody who's providing a lot of interaction is a much easier target for mistakes, slips, and inconsistencies. That's the point. The point is not to instantly lynch anybody active in the thread just because you are more familiar with their name.
My contribs in this thread HAVE been thin. If you wish to lynch me for lurking, then you have enough evidence to do so. That will change, but I've only so much time and I have a lot of PM/reveal work to churn out in Settlement. I do not think that my contributions here have been hard to decipher nor inconsistent. Nor do I think they are grossly fewer than is typical of me in early rounds in most games.
You'll be getting my usual voter pattern analysis etc. soon, but you folks who have been here a while know that it is pretty silly to try before the 3rd vote.
Pizza: you of ALL people know how much I'm pasting into the settlement today.
Grrrr....this is what I get for breaking my own rule and signing up for two at once.
Yes, ultimately, I am trying to change taka's style of play a bit, just as mine was altered in response to many lynches and more than a few murders.
It is basic that interaction provides evidence and lurking does not. We end up all the time in these games hammering any poor
who actually talks in the thread while letting people who slide in, vote, then leave get away with it. I wish to nix that. Anybody who's providing a lot of interaction is a much easier target for mistakes, slips, and inconsistencies. That's the point. The point is not to instantly lynch anybody active in the thread just because you are more familiar with their name.My contribs in this thread HAVE been thin. If you wish to lynch me for lurking, then you have enough evidence to do so. That will change, but I've only so much time and I have a lot of PM/reveal work to churn out in Settlement. I do not think that my contributions here have been hard to decipher nor inconsistent. Nor do I think they are grossly fewer than is typical of me in early rounds in most games.
You'll be getting my usual voter pattern analysis etc. soon, but you folks who have been here a while know that it is pretty silly to try before the 3rd vote.
Pizza: you of ALL people know how much I'm pasting into the settlement today.
Grrrr....this is what I get for breaking my own rule and signing up for two at once.
Originally Posted by Seamus Fermanagh:
Pizza: you of ALL people know how much I'm pasting into the settlement today.
Precisely why I unvoted you, Seamus. It wasn't fair to pressure you for contributing less here because of your activity today. However, and I'm not trying to pick on you, I think you would have more time to contribute in previous days... if I am wrong, all I really need is that explanation. And we have better lynch choices than you, I think.Pizza: you of ALL people know how much I'm pasting into the settlement today.
Whenever I've been online I've posted, I hope GH's vote wasn't for inactivity because that that time I had 14 posts and GH only 6, I believe that if your looking for lurkers theres about 10 more candidates you could pick before I even enter the competition, I just come home to find 2 80 post pages added, I'm not posting too little, but all of you are posting too much. LOL
Too confused and tired, I'll only be called a bandwagonner if I go with the flow so
vote: abstain
for now...
Too confused and tired, I'll only be called a bandwagonner if I go with the flow so
vote: abstain
for now...
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief:
Well, for starters, his lurking is uncommon for him, as opposed to taka's, which is the norm.
My last post, before the one above me, was dated yesterday I believe, posting at least once a day does not classify as lurking in my book.Well, for starters, his lurking is uncommon for him, as opposed to taka's, which is the norm.
post count
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/misc....osted&t=113773
Sorry but it makes no sense, I'm actually a top 10 contributor
Originally Posted by :
Taka: 5 (Seamus, Sasaki, El Diablo, Reenk Roink, Gaelic Cowboy)
Reenk Roink: 4 (boudica, FactionHeir, yoyoma1910, Greyblades)
Seamus: 2 (Andres, YLC)
Ares: 2 (GH, Askthepizzaguy)
Sasaki: 1 (Seireikhaan)
Seireikhaan: 1 (shlin28)
Askthepizzaguy: 1 (F.C)
yoyoma1910: 1 (White_Eyes)
Abstain: Ituralde, Diana Abnoba, 777Ares777
I am here and I can tie it up if people want me to do so. My vote on Ares is worthless anyway. Not sure either Taka or Reenk deserves to go. Do we have a third option?Taka: 5 (Seamus, Sasaki, El Diablo, Reenk Roink, Gaelic Cowboy)
Reenk Roink: 4 (boudica, FactionHeir, yoyoma1910, Greyblades)
Seamus: 2 (Andres, YLC)
Ares: 2 (GH, Askthepizzaguy)
Sasaki: 1 (Seireikhaan)
Seireikhaan: 1 (shlin28)
Askthepizzaguy: 1 (F.C)
yoyoma1910: 1 (White_Eyes)
Abstain: Ituralde, Diana Abnoba, 777Ares777
I did a quick reread but didn't see anything lynchworthy.
In support of lynching taka:
In support of lynching taka:
Originally Posted by The Godfather 3:
“taka?” they both said at the same time, turning to third living villager. But Godfather taka already had two Tommy guns out, pointing directly at both Reenk’s and Andres’s faces. Their eyes widened in surprise for just a second, but then their entire expression turned downcast in shame. They had failed, then.
“taka?” they both said at the same time, turning to third living villager. But Godfather taka already had two Tommy guns out, pointing directly at both Reenk’s and Andres’s faces. Their eyes widened in surprise for just a second, but then their entire expression turned downcast in shame. They had failed, then.
Originally Posted by GSC:
Very well played Taka! Gah!!!!
Very well played Taka! Gah!!!!
Originally Posted by AskTPG:
It's a shame that we didn't follow through on lynching the lurkers as we had originally planned to do.
It's a shame that we didn't follow through on lynching the lurkers as we had originally planned to do.
Originally Posted by reenk:
I tried oh I tried oh I tried to kill little taka, but it was too hard nobody thought he was guilty.
I tried oh I tried oh I tried to kill little taka, but it was too hard nobody thought he was guilty.
Originally Posted by TinCow:
Ug, done in by lurkers again.
Ug, done in by lurkers again.
Originally Posted by Sasaki:
for all our talk about lynching lurkers we really only lynched two of them.
for all our talk about lynching lurkers we really only lynched two of them.
Originally Posted by khaan:
Congrats, Taka. Well earned win. Totally off my radar.
Congrats, Taka. Well earned win. Totally off my radar.
Originally Posted by Seamus:
GRRRRRRRRRR.
And by that I mean, well played taka-san.
You must have been dancing with glee to be one of the one's to ace me when it was you or me on the line -- you could help kill one of the one's gnawing at you in a setting where NOBODY -- including me -- would make much of your vote.
GRRRRRRRRRR.
And by that I mean, well played taka-san.
You must have been dancing with glee to be one of the one's to ace me when it was you or me on the line -- you could help kill one of the one's gnawing at you in a setting where NOBODY -- including me -- would make much of your vote.
...and then I posted the real ending, proving that taka was, in fact, innocent. 
i think im being bandwaggon'd?
edit'd
er........ i didnt get all that stuff u just posted
whats that mean to mean?
hm... vote: reenk to shamelessly save myself
edit'd
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro:
I did a quick reread but didn't see anything lynchworthy.
In support of lynching taka:
I did a quick reread but didn't see anything lynchworthy.
In support of lynching taka:
er........ i didnt get all that stuff u just posted
whats that mean to mean?
hm... vote: reenk to shamelessly save myself
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro:
I did a quick reread but didn't see anything lynchworthy.
In support of lynching taka:
I did a quick reread but didn't see anything lynchworthy.
In support of lynching taka:
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief:
...and then I posted the real ending, proving that taka was, in fact, innocent.
...and then I posted the real ending, proving that taka was, in fact, innocent.
FoS: Sasaki for OBVIOUSLY accusing me
So... uh, anyone for a pint?
Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief:
...and then I posted the real ending, proving that taka was, in fact, innocent.
Or was he?...and then I posted the real ending, proving that taka was, in fact, innocent.
Originally Posted by Yoyoma1910:
So... uh, anyone for a pint?
Why did you say "I knew it!" earlier?So... uh, anyone for a pint?
I'll vote for Reenk Roink. It makes me feel like a total jerk, though. I don't think Reenk is guilty, I just feel Taka deserves a round of benefit of the doubt. We'll question him next round.
unvote: Ares
Vote: Reenk Roink
unvote: Ares
Vote: Reenk Roink
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro:
Why did you say "I knew it!" earlier?
Because I voted A Very Super Market, after he tried to strong arm one of yesterdays suspects.Why did you say "I knew it!" earlier?
i edited my vote post, so here it is again:
Vote: Reenk
Vote: Reenk
Well I suppose if GH had posted the fake-taka entry first and the fake reenk entry second I'd have an entirely different set of quotes. The point was, it's good to have "knowable" people alive in endgame...I just happen to enjoy reenks version of inscrutable more than taka's.
Originally Posted by :
Because I voted A Very Super Market, after he tried to strong arm one of yesterdays suspects.
That makes perfect sense...lol. Because I voted A Very Super Market, after he tried to strong arm one of yesterdays suspects.
Originally Posted by Yoyoma1910:
I knew it!
Hah, Who's making groceries now!
Sir, you have hurt my feelings and aroused suspicions. Explain yourself!!! I knew it!
Hah, Who's making groceries now!
I didn't strong arm anybody, I just kept the tie going. Ptolemists gave no explanation and voted Beefy into the lead. I would have done the same even if I was a townie.
Originally Posted by A Very Super Market:
Sir, you have hurt my feelings and aroused suspicions. Explain yourself!!!
Oh, I'm sorry. You probably say "buying groceries," instead of "making groceries".Sir, you have hurt my feelings and aroused suspicions. Explain yourself!!!
Lets make it official
Unvote: Seamus
Vote: Reenk Roink
Sorry old chap, no hard feelings
Unvote: Seamus
Vote: Reenk Roink
Sorry old chap, no hard feelings
Can someone actually give me a reason for the Taka and Reenk lynches... apparently Taka is a lurker with a higher post count than quite a few people... and reenk is acting like himself...
Im sorry but unless theres a decent candidate im going to vote abstain but i will vote for someone tomorrow if it kills me...
Im sorry but unless theres a decent candidate im going to vote abstain but i will vote for someone tomorrow if it kills me...
VOTE ABSTAIN
I have missed out on a bit in this one and am in no position to say with any degree of certainity who mafia are.
I have missed out on a bit in this one and am in no position to say with any degree of certainity who mafia are.
actually i want to
Vote: seamus
coz.... he's been lurking?
and i also dont think reenk did anything bad, just "reenk being reenk"
Vote: seamus
coz.... he's been lurking?
and i also dont think reenk did anything bad, just "reenk being reenk"Unvote:whoever Vote:taka Reenk has done nothing wrong.....
I would rather have the guy who lurked though several small victories go....
I would rather have the guy who lurked though several small victories go....Single Sign On provided by vBSSO