Does anyone know the advantages and disadvantages of them all yet?
Does anyone know the advantages and disadvantages of them all yet?
"Where some states have an army, the Prussian Army has a state!"
- Voltaire
"There is no mistake; there has been no mistake; and there shall be no mistake."
- 1st Duke of Wellington, Arthur Wellesley
No place like home.
Is there a way of changing your government type? For example, I am currently playing as Austria and I'd quite like to placate the proles by changing to a Constitutional Monarchy. Is a revolution the only way?
Only a few seek liberty; the majority seek nothing more than fair masters - Sallust
A lie told often enough becomes truth - Vladimir Lenin
Yes, it seems you must have a revolution to change government. I think you can go through the game without a revolution, but you'll probably need to spam dragoons a lot. The main advantage of switching to republic is that it gets rid of all the 'clamor for reform' built up by researching the various technologies. After researching everything I was running a -16 to public happiness penalty in every city due to 'clamor for reform'. A little learning IS a dangerous thing, I guess.
Last edited by dopp; 03-08-2009 at 14:51. Reason: To cut a long story short...
For some reason the clamour for reform in my case was only present in those provinces which had universities.
"Whose motorcycle is this?", "It's a chopper, baby.", "Whose chopper is this?", "Zed's.", "Who's Zed?", "Zed's dead baby. Zed's dead." - Butch and Fabienne ride off into the sunset in Pulp Fiction.
You can raise tax levels stupidly high, exempt all regions but your capital from it, remove all troops from your capital, and spam universities, and it should happen.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
- Proud Horseman of the Presence
Meh. I prefer keeping order. An Enlightened Despot suits me just fine. Since it doesn't seem to have any economic benefits (like the govs in GalCiv2, for example), what's the point?
The government types effect the public order and at the same time how other nations view you. If you become a republic you'll likely make enemies with any form on Monarchy. I don't know much else besides.
Supreme power. He can appoint and boot out ministers at will, and also pick out any pretty peasant girl he likes without suffering the penalties as stated by the law.Meh. I prefer keeping order. An Enlightened Despot suits me just fine. Since it doesn't seem to have any economic benefits (like the govs in GalCiv2, for example), what's the point?
Last edited by Megas Methuselah; 03-08-2009 at 18:19.
By "it" I meant the democratic government.
Actually, there are economic benefits, they are just indirect in nature. For example, if you take a look at all the enlightenment techs which allow you to further expand your economy and the like, they all have a clamor for reform negative hanging on them. However, under a republic this is nullified entirely, and with a constitutional monarchy, they are slightly less than for an absolute monarchy.
So if you want to research those economic techs as an absolute monarchy, you will be forced to spend huge amounts of cash on police forces in order to combat all that clamor for reform that you will be getting, or you can choose to forgo the benefits of the techs altogether and fall behind economically.
The downside is that you are unable to select your cabinet as a republic or constitutional monarchy, which can sometimes hurt alot if you have a couple ministers with some nasty traits.
Repent For tomorrow you die -Battlecry of the Dark Angels
Are there any differences between constitutional monarchies and republics, other than the president of a republic changes every 16 turns and the monarch of a con. monarchy is for life?
"Where some states have an army, the Prussian Army has a state!"
- Voltaire
"There is no mistake; there has been no mistake; and there shall be no mistake."
- 1st Duke of Wellington, Arthur Wellesley
No place like home.
Bookmarks