Tallyho lads, rape the houses and burn the women! Leave not a single potted plant alive! Full speed ahead and damn the cheesemongers!
I'm prety sure britain and france have roughly equivalent unit rosters, with france having more elite infantry,
If you should feel for anyone it is the dutch...the reason im never going to play as them is their hideous blue and lack of any unique land unit, atleast in the custom battle roster, the fluyt doesnt really make up for it, seeing as the trade theatres are abit fritzy and you can get much better ships.
"Where some states have an army, the Prussian Army has a state!"
- Voltaire
"There is no mistake; there has been no mistake; and there shall be no mistake."
- 1st Duke of Wellington, Arthur Wellesley
No place like home.
Doesn't Russia get a moral bonus?
I thought I remembered reading that somewhere.
Either way - with their 9 starting provinces and relatively little threat to them initially, I can see building a massive, massive army with Russia.
In my battles with them so far they've fought really hard. The line just keeps moving, regardless of what's coming at them.
I cant really find an argument against the UK getting the best advanced troops. They were the pinnacle of excellence . The Austrians, Prussians and Russians were not at the meeting to decide Napoleon's and France's fate due to the quality or ability of their troops. They were already relics when 1800 rolled around. Spain was a dump.
And when the brazen cry of achilles
Was heard among the trojans, all their hearts
Were troubled, and the full-maned horses whirled
The chariots backward, knowing griefs at hand...
My Balloons:
Playing as the Republiek der Zeven Verenigde Nederlanden
The actual UP flag
While I'm no history expert, the 18th Century armies were pretty unvaried in real life. I don't think anyone is really clear on how the generic units that make up the bulk of armies at the time varied from faction to faction in a really significant way. They all had the same sort of weapons and everyone used line tactics. I guess that any advantages gained technological innovations were short term as discoveries spread, which is already modeled in game. How is CA supposed to justify unique units with big stat differences given the historical reality?
Even so, I agree that the current unit rosters lack faction specific character, though its not clear how to achieve that.
It seems a bit ridiculous to add 'elite' regiments to the normal unit roster. That just encourages the player to build them to the exclusion of the other 'normal' regiments. Extra cost is not sufficient deterrent to the savvy player, or the rich one. Extra time to build though would really hit where it hurts. Perhaps build limits could be considered too.
What about a customizable unit system? Its unlikely to ever be implemented, probably abusable and ahistorical. But Total War is about changing history isn't it?
Bookmarks