I've been playing as Moors on grand campaign on M/M, it is about 70 turns. I have the entire Iberian peninsula and western and central part of Africa. So I decided to make me the undisputed lord of Africa and I send an army against the Egyptians. I was going to take Alexandria but figured it's better to take Gaza since it is a citadel, and then pick up rest of Egyptian empire. They were already at war with Turks, so it is easy mopping them up in remainder of Africa from the troops produced in Gaza.
However, by the time I barely recuperate from the losses against sieging the Egyptians, I am relentlessly attacked by the Mongols. It is a constant tit for tat war going on, and I am on the losing end. For 10-20 turns I would try to skip around their massive stacks and retake Gaza from Alexandria while they were sending troops towards Alexandria, and simply going back and forth like that as they return towards Gaza to take it back. I have their only port of Jerusalem blockaded but whenever I see their stats it says "wealth boundless".
I am not able to fight them from inside castles or settlements it seems. Is it better for me to take them head on in the fields? I am always outnumbered and I think they have a slight technical advantage, not used to either of those conditions.
I had also made mistake of launching invasion from Tunis towards Sicily while it seemed things were settled down in entire Africa (this is the period between me taking out Egypt and the Mongols making war on my eastern African domain). So right now I am faced with two enemies of "boundless wealth" in Mongols and Papal States.
Bookmarks