Results 1 to 30 of 103

Thread: CA requests for next patch:

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: CA requests for next patch:

    Sort out whatever they did in the last patch that means I can't get past the copyright screen?

  2. #2

    Default Re: CA requests for next patch:

    id imagine that will be the BSOD striking again.

  3. #3
    Member Member sassbarman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Vancouver, British Columbia
    Posts
    192

    Default Re: CA requests for next patch:

    Definitely the reinforcement issue and the lack of naval invasions for me to. also another minor issue there needs to be more than two zoom settings for the radar map in land battles.

  4. #4
    Member Member Sisco Americanus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Baltimore, Maryland, USA
    Posts
    38

    Default Re: CA requests for next patch:

    Some tweaks to the diplomacy AI would be nice. There are plenty of things that fall under this, but I think a really big one is that when you go to war with a nation and bring your allies with you, if you make peace with that enemy and force it to become your protectorate, your allies remain at war with that country. This in turn damages your relations with your allies because now you're allied with a country they're at war with.

    Of course, this leads to the larger issue of the AI factions never making peace with one another, leading to never-ending wars that are often inconsequential. I assume it stems from the long-standing problem in TW games of AI factions being too stubborn in negotiations. The AI factions are generally reluctant to make peace with you unless you give them something, preferably some of the territory you conquered from them. This is fine and is fairly historical, I think (the negotiated territorial borders generally didn't coincide with whereever the front was at the time of peace, I don't think), but the problem is that I don't think the AI faction that is winning is ever willing to give up provinces it has conquered, as it then considers those provinces their own. So since neither side is willing to yeild anything, the war usually just keeps on going until one of the factions is eliminated, which is silly. This is all speculation of course.
    Cry "Havoc," and let slip the dogs of war!

  5. #5
    Member Member KozaK13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Newtownards, Co.Down, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
    Posts
    163

    Default Re: CA requests for next patch:

    Fix minor factions fighting suicide wars...possibly by making declining in relations less steep?

    "Where some states have an army, the Prussian Army has a state!"
    - Voltaire


    "There is no mistake; there has been no mistake; and there shall be no mistake."
    - 1st Duke of Wellington, Arthur Wellesley


    No place like home.

  6. #6
    Member Member Polemists's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In the Lou
    Posts
    1,213

    Default Re: CA requests for next patch:

    leading to never-ending wars that are often inconsequential
    This and the trade route bug are my two biggest. So wars are fine. For instance the Ottomans and Russians go at each other every game I've played and usually have a big naval war, fine, great, glorious.

    Other nations though will have war declared when there is no way it means anything.


    GB declared war somehow on Saxony in my game, and yet clearly no English army was in Saxony. I was the ally so it brought me into the war or I took a rep hit.


    London is powerless and the other nations are powerless to attack england without any form of naval invasion by the AI.

    Most of all tho...I want my trade routes back that the last patch stole

  7. #7
    Insane Imperialist. Member Feanaro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The Greatest Country I've Ever Visited, the USA. The only country I've ever visited but still.
    Posts
    133

    Default Re: CA requests for next patch:

    Besides what's been mentioned, here's a few minor ones that really get up my craw.

    Light Dragoons and reloading on horseback.
    Light Dragoons are perfectly capable of reloading on horseback... if they are shooting at an enemy. Either directed or with fire at will. Move them away from enemy units and nothing you do can will make them reload on horseback. They'll sit there the entire battle, twiddling thumbs, until an enemy comes into range. Then they start reloading their empty muskets. Get them on foot and they reload just fine. If they can't reload on horseback, fine. Don't let them reload ever. If they CAN reload while horsed up, they should do so when idle.

    Cannons and cease fire orders.
    I've ordered cannons to cease fire while they were reloading, with fire at will turned off, and they still fire off a shot once loaded. Sometimes into their own horses or my line infantry, sometimes just at the ground. I can understand some justification for a slight delay but these cannons were reloading. I've nearly lost a general to this already.
    Last edited by Feanaro; 03-15-2009 at 08:47.
    Due to the ailing economy, this space has been foreclosed.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO