Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Instead of having a specific part in history a TW sequel... (such as Shogun)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    The Dam Dog Senior Member Sheogorath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,330

    Default Re: Instead of having a specific part in history a TW sequel... (such as Shogun)

    How about 'Sol: Total War'?

    Start out as a microscopic dust particle and build yourself up into a full-fledged planet! Battle the other planets for mass!

    You want broad? Try 4.6 billion years broad!
    Tallyho lads, rape the houses and burn the women! Leave not a single potted plant alive! Full speed ahead and damn the cheesemongers!

  2. #2
    Son of Lusus Member Lusitani's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Olisipo, Lvsitania
    Posts
    265

    Default Re: Instead of having a specific part in history a TW sequel... (such as Shogun)

    Now thats definetely a good one Sheogorath LOL.
    "Deep in Iberia there is a tribe that doesn't rule itself, nor allows anyone to rule it" - Gaius Julius Caesar.






  3. #3
    Slixpoitation Member A Very Super Market's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada, North America, Terra, Sol, Milky Way, Local Cluster, Universe
    Posts
    3,700

    Default Re: Instead of having a specific part in history a TW sequel... (such as Shogun)

    Quote Originally Posted by Sheogorath View Post
    How about 'Sol: Total War'?

    Start out as a microscopic dust particle and build yourself up into a full-fledged planet! Battle the other planets for mass!

    You want broad? Try 4.6 billion years broad!
    I am humbled by your beating my idea-ness
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    WELCOME TO AVSM
    Cool store, bro! I want some ham.
    No ham, pepsi.
    They make deli slices of frozen pepsi now? Awesome!
    You also need to purchase a small freezer for storage of your pepsi.
    It runs on batteries. You'll need a few.
    Uhh, I guess I won't have pepsi then. Do you have change for a twenty?
    You can sift through the penny jar
    ALL WILL BE CONTINUED

    - Proud Horseman of the Presence

  4. #4

    Default Re: Instead of having a specific part in history a TW sequel... (such as Shogun)

    I really would like a return to Ancient Rome/Greece. Triremes, anyone?
    Last edited by NimitsTexan; 03-15-2009 at 06:47.
    "I think it was the right decision to disarm Saddam Hussein, and when the President made the decision, I supported him, and I support the fact that we did disarm him." Senator John Kerry, May 4, 2003

    "It's the wrong war, in the wrong place at the wrong time." Senator John Kerry, 7 September, 2004

  5. #5
    Member Member Polemists's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    In the Lou
    Posts
    1,213

    Default Re: Instead of having a specific part in history a TW sequel... (such as Shogun)

    Napoleonic Wars
    We know this one is coming, the devs have all but officially stated it.

    I do prefer Kingdoms, as fun as it would be to just have 1800-1850 added to the grand campaign I don't think they could do it justice without it feeling repetitive. So I think the small single campaigns are the best way to go.

    We will probably get 4 or 5 if I had to take a guess they'd be

    Napoleonic Wars (They always mention Napoleon in Interviews)

    Civil War (They will probably add England, a Native American, or some unknown faction into this as CA hates two faction only struggles)


    Anglo-Zulu War (Already have africa why not the rest)


    Russo-Persian War (Just for something different and more factions from India side used)




    I don't think that they will include Asia, I think it's just far more likely Asia will be it's own seperate TW title.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Instead of having a specific part in history a TW sequel... (such as Shogun)

    Also, we need the Texas War for Independence/Mexican American War. After playing some for battles, there is some real potential for recreating Bexar, Alama, Mexico City, etc.

    Plus, it would still fit into the (very end of) the horse and musket period.
    "I think it was the right decision to disarm Saddam Hussein, and when the President made the decision, I supported him, and I support the fact that we did disarm him." Senator John Kerry, May 4, 2003

    "It's the wrong war, in the wrong place at the wrong time." Senator John Kerry, 7 September, 2004

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO