Results 1 to 30 of 147

Thread: Possible LotR Successor Game discussion thread

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #32
    Wandering Metsuke Senior Member Zim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,190

    Default Re: Possible LotR Successor Game discussion thread

    I like the idea of tying expansion to edicts again. If land is going to be so important. It would certainly encourage less anemic Senate sessions.

    So if a province was taken in war an edict would be required to keep it, and yet another to give it to a specific player.

    How far would we want to go in tying land to influence? I would say there should be some sort of cap, or diminishing returns. Would landed vassals count? Would the King's authority be tied to the size of his "demesne"?

    I think it's pretty much certain we're keeping the rule/edict/etc. enforcement system from LotR. However, how would this mesh with edicts to keep land. If someone takes a settlement and decides to keep it against an edict (say, by squatting in it) would it be his for purposes of counting influence until the powers that be enforce the law?

    Edit: Will add France when it comes time to poll for faction choices. They do have some advantages like being able to absorb a larger number of players early on. So far probably France, Spain, and England have the most room to "grow" without coming into conflict with the pope for attacking christian factions.
    Last edited by Zim; 03-23-2009 at 23:21.
    V&V RIP Helmut Becker, Duke of Bavaria.



    Come to the Throne Room for hotseats and TW rpgs!

    Kermit's made a TWS2 guide? Oh, the other frog....

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO