Singular: Inuk
Plural: Inuit
One thing is that they are a faction despite the fact that they never formed any political entities worth of mention during this period. They usually lived in small, highly mobile bands, never gathering more than a few hundred people in one place, and even this was usually quite brief and for a few times a year. Naturally, they wouldn't assemble an army larger than this in the highly unlikely case that they actually went to war.
Furthermore, they were hunter-gatherers, not agriculturalists. Whalers, sealers, fishermen, hunters. Not farmers. Sure, I can accept this. CA needed someone to inhabit the region, and they can't just make seperate play mechanics just for a minor faction
However, their graphic representation is just horrible. You have to understand that they were in fact quite recent arrivals. The Inuit (in archaeology known as the Thule culture) originally lived by the Bering Strait and didn't emigrate to the rest of Arctic North America until the 13th century, replacing or assimilating the previous Dorset people. The Vikings actually saw the coast of Labrador centuries before the Inuit arrived. Culturally, they were closer linked to Siberia than they were to the rest of America.
For this reason, the way they have been lumped with the other Native Americans simply torments me. Horses? Those would have been extremely impractical. Loincloths? Seriously, this is the Arctic. I don't think many people would enjoy freezing to death. War paint? Feathers? GAH! They haven't even been given proper names. In fact, the name of their capital, Agvituk, is the only one that originates from their language. All the others are Native American.
If CA can't even be bothered to give the Inuit real names, they might as well leave them out. The area isn't really important to gameplay after all. Switzerland could have been included with much less effort and in a much more correct manner.
End of rant.
Bookmarks